@hasufl @MonetSupply Ok now I'm internally conflicted.
Agree with both takes but haven't previously seen a problem describing LPing as yield.

@hasufl@MonetSupply好吧，现在我内部有矛盾。
同意这两种观点，但之前没有发现将LPing描述为收益率的问题。

RT: ⟠ Latest Week in Ethereum News!
⛅ @Cloudflare to stake their $ETH to support the Merge
🐼 @dannyryan mainnet-shadow-fork-5 went exceedingly well
🛡️ @fredriksvantes client bug bounties now $250k
https://weekinethereumnews.com...
Thanks to @NexusMutual for making this issue possible 🙏

转发：⟠ 以太坊新闻最新一周！
⛅ @Cloudflare将入股$ETH以支持合并
🐼 @dannyryan mainnet-shadow-fork-5进行得非常好
🛡️ @fredriksvantes客户bug悬赏现在25万美元
https://weekinethereumnews.com...
感谢@NexusMutual使此问题成为可能🙏

@stephendpalley But Sir, Have you tried the Tokenhouse
https://maps.app.goo.gl/dbWNQP...

@斯蒂芬·帕利先生，你试过代币店吗
https://maps.app.goo.gl/dbWNQP...

@latetot @fraxfinance After the last few weeks I think any level of undercollateralisation could lead to the peg breaking down to at least the collateral levels, and possibly lower, at some point.
I could be overreacting but even lower levels of risk accumulate over long enough time frames.

@在过去几周后，我认为任何程度的欠融资都可能导致钉住汇率至少下降到抵押品水平，并可能在某个时候下降。
我可能反应过度，但在足够长的时间内，风险水平甚至更低。

The decentralised stablecoin challenge (simplified)
Goal: Stable and Scalable.
Scalability requires capital efficiency.
Capital efficiency requires Lindy.
Lindy requires wide use & stability.
Stability requires overcollateralisation.
Overcollateralisation is capital inefficient.

分散式stablecoin挑战（简化）
目标：稳定且可扩展。
可扩展性要求资本效率。
资本效率需要林迪。
Lindy需要广泛使用；稳定性
稳定需要过度压实。
过度抵押是资本效率低下的表现。

Algo stables have tried to win by breaking this assumption:
> Stability requires overcollateralisation (if you don't have Lindy yet)
Overcollateralised stables sacrifice scalability in a bid to get Lindy, quite difficult when you don't have scalability.
It's hard.

Algo stables试图通过打破这一假设来获胜：
&燃气轮机；稳定需要过度共担（如果你还没有Lindy）
过度折叠的马厩牺牲了可扩展性以获得Lindy，当您没有可扩展性时，这是非常困难的。
这很难。

@sedCapital @richardchen39 https://twitter.com/CelsiusXDe...

@sedCapital@richardchen39https://twitter.com/CelsiusXDe...

It takes time and consistency to build trust in a new system. One more step in the right direction. https://twitter.com/NexusMutua...

在新系统中建立信任需要时间和一致性。朝着正确的方向又迈出了一步。https://twitter.com/NexusMutua...

RT: But the haters say that Nexus doesn't pay out claims... 🤔
Fun fact: Those that are buying $1M+ covers are mostly institutions/family offices and aren't anon degens larping on crypto Twitter in their echo chamber. https://twitter.com/NexusMutua...

RT：但仇恨者说Nexus不支付索赔。。。🤔
有趣的事实：那些正在购买100多万美元封面的大多是机构/家族理财办公室，而不是anon degens在其回音室的加密推特上大张旗鼓。https://twitter.com/NexusMutua...

@BowTiedIguana Primary objective was/is achieved (enough capital to pay claims) but there are certainly improvements that can be made. The bonding curve was designed in 2018, and we need to learn/adapt based on experience and progress elsewhere.

@BowTiedIguana的主要目标已经实现（有足够的资本支付索赔），但肯定还有改进的余地。债券曲线设计于2018年，我们需要根据其他地方的经验和进展进行学习/调整。

@BowTiedIguana @BraveDeFi v2 won't change tokenomics, it's demand focused. Turning Nexus into a market place for risk.
Separately, there is a tokenomics working group how are discussing and building models to test various options.

@BowTiedIguana@BraveDeFi v2不会改变tokenomics，它是以需求为中心的。将Nexus转变为风险市场。
另外，还有一个tokenomics工作组正在讨论和构建模型以测试各种选项。

RT: Kicking off our AMA session with @roxdanila, CTO of @NexusMutual 🚀🚀
Discussing her early career, getting into web3, meeting @HughKarp and more!
There is still time to join us and ask a live question to Roxana 👇
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e... https://t.co/e64eLeadiq

RT：与NexusMutual首席技术官roxdanila开始我们的AMA会议🚀🚀
讨论她早期的职业生涯，进入web3，与@HughKarp会面等等！
还有时间加入我们，向Roxana提问👇
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e... https://t.co/e64eLeadiq

Risk management is a profit centre.

风险管理是一个利润中心。

RT: Want to ask anything about smart contract cover?🧐
Now is your chance to get answers from the CTO (@roxdanila) of @NexusMutual herself! 🔥
Join us this Wednesday at 5pm GMT+1 for an awesome AMA session! ✨
@encodeclub https://twitter.com/encodeclub...

RT：想问一些关于智能合同保险的问题吗？🧐
现在你有机会从@NexusMutual的CTO（@roxdanila）那里得到答案了！🔥
本周三下午5点GMT+1加入我们，参加一场精彩的AMA课程！✨
@编码俱乐部https://twitter.com/encodeclub...

RT: It's time for an AMA! 💬
Join us on Wednesday, 18th May at 5 pm GMT+1 for a live chat with @roxdanila - CTO @NexusMutual!
Find out everything about decentralised insurance, the life of a CTO, Roxana's experiences and more 💯
Grab your free ticket:
https://ow.ly/kSOh50J2H8A

RT：是AMA的时候了！💬
5月18日星期三下午5点GMT+1加入我们，与@roxdanila-CTO@NexusMutual进行实时聊天！
更多关于丽莎娜的分散生活体验💯
带上你的免费机票：
https://ow.ly/kSOh50J2H8A

RT: Stay up to date on all things Nexus Mutual by reading our newsletter: https://nexusmutual.substack.c...
In this week’s issue:
✅ Rari Capital claims
✅ Nexus @ Permissionless
✅ Mutant Marketing quarterly review
✅ Last week in cover sales

RT：阅读我们的时事通讯，了解Nexus Mutual的最新信息：https://nexusmutual.substack.c...
本期：
✅ 资本索赔
✅ Nexus@Permissionless
✅ 突变营销季度回顾
✅ 上周的封面销售

@hasufl The mechanism design likely limits scalability (don't think it can change to target $1) but having users understand what they are using is important.
A big but miss-sold/misleading product is really bad...

@hasufl机制设计可能会限制可扩展性（不要认为它可以更改为目标1美元），但让用户了解他们在使用什么很重要。
一个大但未售出/误导的产品真的很糟糕。。。

RAI should stay like it is and not re-denominate to $1.
If it goes to $1 users will incorrectly assume it stays pegged to $1. This UX barrier helps users understand RAI is different.
Treat RAI like a non-US currency, relatively stable but not pegged.

RAI应该保持原样，而不是重新命名为1美元。
如果它涨到1美元，用户会错误地认为它与1美元挂钩。这个用户体验障碍帮助用户理解RAI是不同的。
将RAI视为一种非美国货币，相对稳定但不挂钩。

You could re-denominate to $1.10 or something, to make mental math easier but different to $1 is important.

你可以把面额改为1.10美元或其他什么，让心算变得更简单，但与1美元不同很重要。

@TrustlessState Not necessarily. A full 100% loss hack could do the same thing.

@不一定是可靠的状态。一个完全100%损失的黑客也可以做同样的事情。