用户 Curve(@ CurveFinance) 的最新消息

@0xLagoon @CryptMisc Well. If you are to measure the IL - you need to look at longer time frames (months? years?). Or otherwise, you have to admit that you are holding an asset which is neither btc, nor eth, nor usd, but rather something special.
Need prices of [eth/btc/usd] as one asset 👍

@0xLagoon@CryptMisc井。如果你要测量IL,你需要看更长的时间框架(月?年?)。否则,你必须承认你持有的资产既不是btc,也不是eth,也不是美元,而是某种特殊的东西。
需要【eth/btc/美元】的价格作为一项资产👍

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@0xSpaydh @BarryFried1 🤣

@0xspaydh@barryfried1🤣

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@0xLagoon Impermanent loss is if you compare it with holding the combination of BTC, USD, ETH. However, if you treat it as an individual asset - it's a decent one, but it's still a crypto!

@0xLagon非永久性亏损是指将其与持有BTC、USD、ETH的组合进行比较。然而,如果你将其视为一项个人资产——这是一项不错的资产,但它仍然是一项加密资产!

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@0xLagoon One should consider tricrypto2 as a separate asset which is more stable than ETH but less stable than USD

@0xLagon一家应将tricrypto2视为一项单独的资产,其稳定性高于ETH,但低于美元

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@tomsimps0n Actually can, but poking the code for some sweeet optimizations

@tomsimps0n实际上可以,但需要对代码进行一些sweeet优化

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

tricrypto2 is doing great today. >100% liquidity utilization, 10% base apy, good admin fees from it! https://t.co/ipHWdnUUqy

tricrypto2今天做得很好&燃气轮机;100%的流动性利用率,10%的基本apy,良好的it管理费用!https://t.co/ipHWdnUUqy

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

RT: Yep, lowering fee to 1 bps seems to have worked so far
Weekly volume: https://twitter.com/DefiMoon/s... https://t.co/QKVvmOjgs5

RT:是的,到目前为止,将费用降低到1个基点似乎已经奏效了
周产量:https://twitter.com/DefiMoon/s... https://t.co/QKVvmOjgs5

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@Crypnovice88 I think you meant that improvements are possible 👍

@Crypnovice88我想你的意思是可以改进👍

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@smart_john23 @ausnotes @AlgodTrading @allianceblock Oh that's easy to imagine, there are many examples. For example, Celsius

@smart\u john23@ausnotes@AlgodTrading@allianceblock噢,这很容易想象,有很多例子。例如,摄氏度

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@toptickcrypto Good thing though - the higher the liquidity is - the more it resists the panic

@不过toptickcrypto是件好事——流动性越高——它越能抵御恐慌

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@Crypnovice88 @Uniswap @RuneKek @haydenzadams @Tetranode @samkazemian On a more serious note on how to do better. Can have a max-density v2 pool which can move liquidity around. cvxfxs pool does that. At least, something along those lines could be really good for staked derivatives where the market-driven discount can be ~constant and nonzero

@Crypnovice88@Uniswap@RuneKek@haydenzadams@Tetranode@samkazemian关于如何做得更好的更严肃说明。可以有一个最大密度v2池,可以移动流动性。cvxfxs池就是这样做的。至少,在市场驱动的贴现率可以保持不变且不为零的情况下,沿着这些思路进行的一些事情可能真的对押注衍生品有好处

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@Crypnovice88 @Uniswap @RuneKek @haydenzadams @Tetranode @samkazemian Opinion: mid-IQ "crypto researchers" are a total failure

@Crypnovice88@Uniswap@RuneKek@haydenzadams@Tetranode@samkazemian观点:智商中等的“加密研究人员”完全是失败的

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

So unless you guys crash all crypto to zero (plz don't), we will probably have pretty good admin fees collected this Thursday (will be known sometime on Wednesday)

所以,除非你们将所有加密都崩溃为零(请不要),否则我们可能会在本周四收取相当好的管理费(周三某个时候会知道)

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@Mudit__Gupta Code is good, but can you plz send them all on DVDs?

@Mudit\uu Gupta代码很好,但你能用DVD把它们全部发送出去吗?

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@Greg0x2660609 Fore sure, and there are very good use cases where CeFi is unavoidable. But sometimes there are solid DeFi alternatives

@Greg0x2660609是肯定的,并且有一些很好的用例,其中CeFi是不可避免的。但有时也有可靠的DeFi替代品

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

Wow, seeing replies. Surprised this wasn't obvious to everyone yet https://twitter.com/CurveFinan...

Although everyone panics, the Celsius fiasco is a good example of why DeFi is better than CeFi

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve Finance @CurveFinance

哇,看到回复了。令人惊讶的是,这对每个人来说都不明显https://twitter.com/CurveFinan...

尽管每个人都感到恐慌,但摄氏度的惨败就是一个很好的例子,说明了为什么DeFi比CeFi更好

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@AlgodTrading That for sure.
True DeFi doesn't have to rely on "management", but the alternative of management is the rules written in code at the start.

@AlgodTrading这是肯定的。
True DeFi不必依赖于“管理”,但管理的另一种选择是在开始时用代码编写的规则。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@rdaneelz What does "stop bank run" mean? Rug?

@rdaneelz“停止银行挤兑”是什么意思?小地毯

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@joeblau Not even that (transparency), though it is good for defi which is upgradable. Sometimes it's immutable code which doesn't allow the system to do wrong things

@乔布劳(joeblau)甚至没有做到这一点(透明度),尽管这对可升级的defi有好处。有时它是不可变的代码,不允许系统做错误的事情

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@Tay06825391 @DU09BTC Absolutely, need to check that, and also quality of the code. Some good folks report their findings here: https://cryptorisks.substack.c...

@Tay06825391@DU09BTC绝对,需要检查一下,还有代码的质量。一些好人在这里报告他们的发现:https://cryptorisks.substack.c...

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情