RT: 🚀TUSDFRAXBP incentive pool is LIVE on @VotiumProtocol!Vote NOW,vlCVX holders!
⏰Now-Aug 9,2022,00:00,UTC
💰Total reward 10,000 $TUSD
🔗https://votium.app/
TUSDFRAXBP pool is live on @CurveFinance for only 8 days, & its TVL is ranking 3rd among all FRAXBP pools!@fraxfinance https://t.co/Fw4KDEeY8J

RT：🚀TUSDFRAXBP 激励池在@VotiumProtocol 上线！现在投票，vlCVX 持有者！
⏰现在-2022年8月9日00:00，UTC
💰总奖励 10,000 $TUSD
🔗https://votium.app/
TUSDFRAXBP 池在@CurveFinance 上仅存在 8 天，

Redeemable coins are into incentivizing votes! https://twitter.com/tusdio/sta...

可赎回硬币用于激励投票！ https://twitter.com/tusdio/sta...

RT: In this vid, I talked about @CurveFinance historical APY, how it's more stable than other protocols, and how to boost your yields w/ @ConvexFinance + @0xconcentrator
👉https://youtu.be/FtzDlWdcou8 👈
🎁Share + RT + tag 3 frenz to win 77 $CRV 👀 (1 winner)
- https://dune.com/mrblock_buidl... https://t.co/HnpqEoSD3u

RT：在这个视频中，我谈到了@CurveFinance 历史 APY，它如何比其他协议更稳定，以及如何使用 @ConvexFinance @0xconcentrator 提高您的收益率
👉https://youtu.be/FtzDlWdcou8 👈
🎁分享 RT tag 3 frenz 赢取 77 $CRV 👀（1 名）
- https://dune.com/mrblock_buidl... https://t.co/ HnpqEoSD3u

@Swagtimus Their incentive is to follow the social consensus indeed

@Swagtimus 他们的动机是确实遵循社会共识

@TheOne19125869 @nevernudejorter True actually. Oracle providers can support both if they want to, but derivative staking operators cannot clone the only staking op they have, just like USDs which back stablecoins cannot be cloned

@TheOne19125869 @nevernudejorter 实际上是真的。如果 Oracle 提供商愿意，他们可以同时支持这两者，但衍生质押运营商无法克隆他们拥有的唯一质押操作，就像无法克隆支持稳定币的美元一样

@Swagtimus Well, at the very least, if two major stablecoin issuers choose some fork - everyone will most likely be forced to use that one

@Swagtimus 好吧，至少，如果两个主要的稳定币发行人选择一些分叉 - 每个人很可能会被迫使用那个

@sw0nt @vyperlang Probably not a great things to do. uint256(-1) uses much more bytecode, addition uses the same gas as subtraction, and stack too deep is never a problem in vyper in the first place

@sw0nt @vyperlang 可能不是一件好事。 uint256(-1) 使用更多的字节码，加法使用与减法相同的气体，而且堆栈太深在 vyper 中从来都不是问题

@nevernudejorter Yes, they are in control of Ethereum, essentially

@nevernudejorter 是的，他们基本上控制着以太坊

There is a popular topic of DAOs voting to support or not ETH-PoS / ETH-PoW.
For Curve DAO, it is impossible to force the choice of one or another (too decentralized). Fork will inevitably clone DAO and CRV, however only chain chosen by stablecoins will be viable for DAO.

有一个热门话题是 DAO 投票支持或不支持 ETH-PoS / ETH-PoW。
对于 Curve DAO，不可能强制选择一个或另一个（过于分散）。 Fork 将不可避免地克隆 DAO 和 CRV，但是只有稳定币选择的链才能用于 DAO。

RT: 🎉🎉🎉
Vyper x EthCC Hackathon results are IN! 👇
(calling all Vyper devs, take a peep and see if you have what it takes to win our next Hackathon!)
@EthCCHack @EthCC @vyperlang @CurveFinance

转发：🎉🎉🎉
Vyper x EthCC 黑客松结果公布！ 👇
（打电话给所有 Vyper 开发者，看看你是否有能力赢得我们的下一次黑客马拉松！）
@EthCChack @EthCC @vyperlang @CurveFinance

@pcaversaccio @_bout3fiddy_ Yeah, definitely drastically different from our workflow

@pcaversaccio @_bout3fiddy_ 是的，与我们的工作流程完全不同

@pcaversaccio @_bout3fiddy_ Yeah, it depends on your workflow, eg if you need ready-made ci integrations at all

@pcaversaccio @_bout3fiddy_ 是的，这取决于您的工作流程，例如，如果您需要现成的 ci 集成

@pcaversaccio @_bout3fiddy_ You should really try boa. In our “slow” tests it is faster than foundry

@pcaversaccio @_bout3fiddy_ 你真的应该试试蟒蛇。在我们的“慢”测试中，它比代工更快

@kermankohli If bribes are counted though, returns might compare well with emissions

@kermankohli 如果算上贿赂，回报可能与排放量相当

@kermankohli That view is too simplistic: Bitcoin fails that check for example (though it’s value is hardly in fees).
It’s probably better to look at supply in 2-4 years after you lock and do pe based on that. Or maybe there is some other good methodology

@kermankohli 这种观点过于简单：例如，比特币未能通过该检查（尽管它的价值几乎不在于费用）。
在锁定并基于此进行 pe 后，最好在 2-4 年内查看供应。或者也许还有其他一些好的方法

@kermankohli Too bad you missed us in review. Total value distributed to vecrv is 100M, + there are bribes

@kermankohli 太糟糕了，您在评论中错过了我们。分配给vecrv的总价值是100M，有贿赂

RT: Vote to approve whitelisting of treasury held, and farmed, $CRV
Links included below https://twitter.com/SeaSaltyFu...

RT：投票批准将持有和养殖的国库 $CRV 列入白名单
下面包含的链接 https://twitter.com/SeaSaltyFu...

RT: I use @StakeDAOHQ to earn 69.90% on my @CurveFinance CRV tokens.
Here's how I do it (and how you can too before Thursday noon) :

RT：我使用@StakeDAOHQ 在我的@CurveFinance CRV 代币上赚取 69.90%。
这是我的做法（以及在星期四中午之前你也可以这样做）：

@CannaCollectiv2 Using immutables and create2 can help to save maybe 2k or something but that’s nothing compare to the savings which can be done

@CannaCollectiv2 使用 immutables 和 create2 可以帮助节省 2k 或其他东西，但这与可以做到的节省相比无济于事

@CannaCollectiv2 Nope not that. Like optimizing math, using better initial values when finding solutions by iterations, new Vyper compiler, unsafe math, using analytical solutions in some cases when possible. Some internal calls can become 10x cheaper

@CannaCollectiv2 不，不是这样。就像优化数学，在通过迭代找到解决方案时使用更好的初始值，新的 Vyper 编译器，不安全的数学，在某些情况下尽可能使用分析解决方案。一些内部电话可能会便宜 10 倍