@garypalmerjr @Excellion @VitalikButerin @WhalePanda @wullon @LucLammers @adam3us @PeterMcCormack No need. I didn't take it personally, nor did I think he meant it that way. It's just a difference of opinion.

@garypalmerjr@Excellion@VitalikButerin@WhalePanda@wullon@LucLammers@adam3us@PeterMcCormack不需要。我没有把这件事当真，我也不认为他是那个意思。只是意见不同而已。

@lowprofileplayb Because biometrics are not suitable for primary ID. They can be easily copied and faked and are impossible to replace if they are copied.
I would never use a fingerprint as a primary or only identifier for anything of value. Not even if my smartphone didn't hold any crypto.

@lowprofileplayb，因为生物特征不适用于主ID。它们很容易被复制和伪造，如果被复制，就不可能被替换。
我永远不会用指纹作为任何有价值的东西的主要或唯一的标识符。即使我的智能手机没有密码。

@herzmeisterderw @MagnusVollen "did anyone dare to ask about the energy consumption of Luxembourg"
"Did anyone dare ask about 51% attacks"
"cHinEse MinErs!"
"7tps"
It's exhausting on all sides

@herzmeisterw@MagnusVollen“有人敢问卢森堡的能源消耗吗”
“有人敢问51%的袭击事件吗”
“中国矿工！”
“7tps”
各方面都很累

@herzmeisterderw @MagnusVollen It's not the gotcha that you think it is, anymore than the myriad gotcha questions that I get asked about Bitcoin by altcoin fanbois.

@herzmeisterw@MagnusVollen这并不是你想的那样，而是我被altcoin fanbois问到的关于比特币的无数问题。

@herzmeisterderw @MagnusVollen They did and I answered it

@Herzmeisterw@MagnusVollen他们做了，我回答了

Mood 24/7 https://twitter.com/evacide/st...

心情24/7https://twitter.com/evacide/st。。。

@namcarver @ConciseAnkur @adam3us @WhalePanda @wullon @LucLammers @Excellion @VitalikButerin It wasn't a stab. I was where you are not that long ago. I'm simply pointing out that this platform works differently at different scales.
I don't care about follower counts nor do I value opinions based on that metric.

@Namcaver@ConciseAnkur@adam3us@WhalePanda@wullon@LucLammers@Excellion@VitalikButerin这不是刺伤。不久前我还在你那里。我只是想指出，这个平台在不同的规模下工作是不同的。
我不在乎追随者的数量，也不看重基于这个指标的意见。

Thanks for asking your #Ethereum questions during the Bonus Livestream session today! If you want to learn more about how you can support free educational sessions like this one, check out my Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/aanton... https://t.co/jJ4l6Px5Ph

感谢您在今天的有奖直播环节中提出您的以太坊问题！如果您想了解更多关于如何支持免费教育课程的信息，请查看我的Patreon：https://www.patreon.com/aanton。。。https://t.co/jJ4l6Px5Ph

@ak_kim0 @WhalePanda @wullon @LucLammers @adam3us @Excellion @VitalikButerin .@serhack_ has beat me to it and has already written a great book "Mastering Monero".

@阿克·金0@WhalePanda@wullon@LucLammers@adam3us@Excellion@VitalikButerin@serhack悻已经击败我，并且已经写了一本伟大的书《掌握莫内罗》。

@namcarver @ConciseAnkur @adam3us @WhalePanda @wullon @LucLammers @Excellion @VitalikButerin That may be true if you have 30 followers. It is not true at scale.
There's no echo in a chamber once it gets beyond a few thousand voices. At that point blocking is imperative to reduce noise and does not create an opinion "bubble" effect.

@namcarver@ConciseAnkur@adam3us@WhalePanda@wullon@LucLammers@Excellion@VitalikButerin如果你有30个追随者，这可能是真的。这在规模上是不正确的。
一个房间一旦超过几千个声音就没有回音了。在这一点上，封锁是必要的，以减少噪音，并不会造成意见“泡沫”效应。

@wullon @WhalePanda @LucLammers @adam3us @Excellion @VitalikButerin This falls under "fundamental attribution bias". Seeing a negative underlying motive bias in others' behavior but not in our own.
We all have motive. We all have cognitive biases.
I think I have demonstrated that my biases are not overriding my reason, at least not often.

@wullon@WhalePanda@LucLammers@adam3us@Excellion@VitalikButerin这属于“基本归因偏差”。在别人的行为中看到一种消极的动机偏见，而不是我们自己的行为。
我们都有动机。我们都有认知偏差。
我想我已经证明了我的偏见并没有压倒我的理由，至少不经常。

The #Ethereum Basics Bonus Livestream starts now!
🎥🍿 Join to chat & watch: https://aantonop.io/bonusqaeth... https://t.co/nsK3QGSKAM

以太坊基础奖励Livestream现在开始！
🎥🍿 加入聊天和观看：https://aantonop.io/bonusqaeth。。。https://t.co/nsK3QGSKAM

@CristinaAberna3 I've answered that question in the form of a 400 page book "Mastering Ethereum" which was the culmination of 3+ years of research.
You can read it for free online to find out.

@我以一本400页的书《掌握以太坊》的形式回答了这个问题，这是3年多研究的成果。
你可以在网上免费阅读。

The #Ethereum Basics Bonus Livestream starts in 30 minutes! Join to learn about the Ethereum network, how it’s different from #Bitcoin, and how Ether is also a #cryptocurrency.
🍿 1PM EDT/1700 UTC: https://aantonop.io/bonusqaeth... https://t.co/AtI7GHYVs7

以太坊基础奖励Livestream 30分钟后开始！加入我们，了解以太坊网络，它与比特币的区别，以及以太如何也是一种加密货币。
🍿 美国东部时间下午1点/协调世界时1700：https://aantonop.io/bonusqaeth。。。https://t.co/AtI7GHYVs7

@AvdiuSazan ??? I never blocked anyone for mentioning PoS.
You are making assumptions about my motivations for blocking people based on nothing but correlation. That's a weak basis, given that I block liberally to maintain clarity of my feed.

@阿维迪乌萨赞？？？我从来没有因为提到PoS而阻止任何人。
你是在假设我封杀别人的动机是基于相关性。这是一个薄弱的基础，考虑到我自由地阻止，以保持我的饲料清晰。

Lots of questions about ETH2, PoS, Casper, staking, sharding and beacon chains.
I will be answering those, but also beginner-level #Ethereum questions one hour from now.
Join me! https://twitter.com/aantonop/s...

很多关于ETH2，PoS，Casper，立桩，切分和信标链的问题。
我将在一小时后回答这些问题，同时也是初级水平的以太坊问题。
加入我！https://twitter.com/aantonop/s。。。

@WhalePanda @wullon @LucLammers @adam3us @Excellion @VitalikButerin The bottom line is that my opinion on Ethereum is not as easily dismissed as ignorance and this causes some cognitive dissonance, begging for an alternative explanation. The monetary motive is wrong, but comforting. The alternative (informed opinion) is not so comforting.

@WhalePanda@wullon@LucLammers@adam3us@Excellion@VitalikButerin底线是，我对以太坊的看法并不像无知那样容易被忽视，这导致了一些认知上的不和谐，要求另一种解释。货币动机是错误的，但令人欣慰。另一种选择（见多识广的意见）就不那么令人欣慰了。

@DWorc @ShapeShift_io @benmezrich @ErikVoorhees @nathanielpopper @saifedean @maxborders @brianeha I liked it quite a lot. Casey and Vigna have written two great books in our space.

@DWorc@ShapeShift_io@benmezrich@ErikVoorhees@nathanielpopper@saifedan@maxborders@brianeha我非常喜欢它。凯西和维格纳在我们的空间写了两本好书。

@WhalePanda @MostertHantus @wullon @LucLammers @adam3us @Excellion @VitalikButerin The same argument is made by BCH and BSV fans about Lightning "always 18 months away" and it is equally disingenuous.
Say what you will about the monetary policy, but the PoS technology developed for ETH2 is real and very interesting.

@WhalePanda@MostertHantus@wullon@LucLammers@adam3us@Excellion@VitalikButerin BCH和BSV的粉丝们也提出了同样的论点，关于闪电“总是在18个月之后”，这同样是不真诚的。
说说你对货币政策的看法，但是为ETH2开发的PoS技术是真实的，而且非常有趣。

@WhalePanda @wullon @LucLammers @adam3us @Excellion @VitalikButerin I wrote this book and continue to study Ethereum because I think it is interesting, from a technical perspective. This interest has cost me money and some goodwill from BTC maxis, but I continue despite these costs.
I am motivated by intellectual curiosity.

@WhalePanda@wullon@LucLammers@adam3us@Excellion@VitalikButerin我写了这本书，并继续研究以太坊，因为从技术角度来看，它很有趣。这项利息让我付出了金钱和BTC maxis的一些善意，但我还是继续下去，尽管付出了这些代价。
我是出于好奇心。