@TRyanGregory Reminds me of when one part of CDC was saying not to use N95s for covid and another part of CDC was saying to use N95s for wildfire smoke, AT THE EXACT SAME TIME.

@TRyanGregory 提醒我，当 CDC 的一部分说不要将 N95 用于 covid 并且 CDC 的另一部分说在完全相同的时间使用 N95 来处理野火烟雾时。

@benny171a @PeterDrake125 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@benny171a @PeterDrake125 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@benny171a @BertThere @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait They said it when studies showed high efficacy, and generally in more measured terms like "highly unlikely". Biden biden said it (july), that was after delta had emerged and it wasn't as accurate (though remained true with a booster).

@benny171a @BertThere @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 当研究显示出高效时，他们会这么说，而且通常用更衡量的术语来说，比如“极不可能”。拜登·拜登（7 月）说过，那是在三角洲出现之后，它并不那么准确（尽管使用助推器仍然如此）。

@PeterDrake125 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait It wasn't wrong. Studies showed the vaccines to be highly effective in stopping infection AT THE TIME.

@PeterDrake125 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 没错。研究表明，这些疫苗在当时阻止感染方面非常有效。

@benny171a @PeterDrake125 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 90% effective in healthcare workers who were tested every week. There were also a couple of large scale studies from Israel showing similar results (don't have link, you can find them).
https://www.cdc.gov/media/rele...

@benny171a @PeterDrake125 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 对每周接受检测的医护人员有 90% 的有效性。还有一些来自以色列的大规模研究显示了类似的结果（没有链接，你可以找到它们）。
https://www.cdc.gov/media/rele ...

@PeterDrake125 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait You're not wrong when you state something that is true at the time and then conditions change.
If you make a prediction like "these vaccines are going to continue to work just as well for 10 years" then you could turn out to be wrong. No one did that as far as I know.

@PeterDrake125 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 当您陈述当时正确的事情然后情况发生变化时，您并没有错。
如果您做出诸如“这些疫苗将在 10 年内继续有效地发挥作用”之类的预测，那么您可能会被证明是错误的。据我所知，没有人这样做。

@TrumpUndead @jonathanchait I don't recall ever saying I wanted to give her money.

@TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 我不记得曾经说过我想给她钱。

@PeterDrake125 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait No he isn't. It was correct at the time.

@PeterDrake125 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 不，他不是。当时是正确的。

@NJoIdaR @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait This is misinformation. The vaccines are very effective, they're just not as effective as they originally work at stopping infection.

@NJoIdaR @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 这是错误信息。这些疫苗非常有效，只是它们在阻止感染方面不如最初有效。

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...< /一>

@PeterDrake125 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait That was correct according to studies at the time. There was a small risk of breakthrough, yes, but nothing is perfect.

@PeterDrake125 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 根据当时的研究这是正确的。有一点突破的风险，是的，但没有什么是完美的。

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait Don't sea lion. It's a bad look.

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait 不要海狮。这是一个糟糕的样子。

@RobertMeynell @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait Nobody promised you anything about how vaccines would work for 25 years, or even any number of years.

@RobertMeynell @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 没有人向你承诺疫苗将如何工作 25 年，甚至任何年。

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait Don't sea lion. If you want to see studies you can find them. There are many.

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait 不要海狮。如果你想看研究，你可以找到它们。有许多。

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait Bivalent vaccines for earlier stains (beta, delta, and BA.1) have gone through human trials. They behaved the same as any other strain vaccine.

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait 针对早期污渍（beta、delta 和 BA.1）的二价疫苗已通过人体试验。它们的行为与任何其他毒株疫苗相同。

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait It has been used on billions of people over 3 years. Not new.

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait 它已在 3 年内用于数十亿人。不是新的。

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait It's been used on billions of people over 3 years.

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait 它已在 3 年内用于数十亿人。

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait IT IS THE SAME VACCINE WITH AN UPDATED STRAIN.
I don't know what part of that is hard to understand. The strain update has only been tested in animals, as is done with flu shots. The vaccine itself, with earlier strains, has been tested in clinical trials.

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait 它是相同的疫苗，具有更新的菌株。
我不知道其中哪一部分难以理解。菌株更新仅在动物身上进行了测试，流感疫苗也是如此。疫苗本身和早期的毒株已经在临床试验中进行了测试。

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait It is the same formulation with an updated strain, which is how flu shots have been updated since forever. You don't need to retest the same vaccine every time you update the strain.

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait 这是更新菌株的相同配方，这就是流感疫苗自永远以来更新的方式。每次更新毒株时，您都不需要重新测试相同的疫苗。

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait They were not only made but it was tested on many humans. It wasn't manufactured in large quantity to give to the public, although it is being given now in UK and probably elsewhere.

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait 它们不仅是制造出来的，而且在许多人身上进行了测试。尽管它现在在英国和其他地方都在提供，但它并没有大量生产以提供给公众。