@hjelle_brian @ColinDotNet Rodent pets likely don't have any contacts outside the home, so they wouldn't increase owner risk except when initially acquired, which seems very hard to measure outside of a zero covid environment.

@hjelle_brian @ColinDotNet 啮齿动物宠物可能在家外没有任何接触，因此它们不会增加主人风险，除非最初获得，这在零 covid 环境之外似乎很难衡量。

@JusticeInMed @thehouseofpod This is actually similar to the Bangladesh masking study, where some people were randomly assigned to be encouraged to mask, and others weren't (and, in practice, masked less or not at all). No one was told not to mask.

@JusticeInMed@thehouseofpod这实际上类似于孟加拉国的掩蔽研究，在该研究中，一些人被随机分配被鼓励进行掩蔽，而另一些人则没有（实际上，掩蔽较少或根本没有）。没有人被告知不要戴面具。

@JusticeInMed @thehouseofpod No, I'm describing randomization in an environment where people aren't masking.
Arm 1: Masking
Arm 2: Whatever people are already doing (mostly not masking)
People are assigned randomly (perhaps by classroom, etc.)
No one is being told not to mask.

@JusticeInMed@thehouseofpod No，我描述的是在人们不伪装的环境中的随机化。
第1组：掩蔽
武器2：无论人们已经在做什么（大部分不是掩蔽）
人员随机分配（可能是按教室等）
没有人被告知不要戴面具。

@flanbites That's another program IN ADDITION to this one. 8 tests per month paid for by insurance if you have private insurance.

@法兰比特这是除此之外的另一个程序。如果您有私人保险，每月8次测试由保险公司支付。

@nohomelikeplace No. Four tests for now. There is no clarity that it is one time, and likely isn't (numbers wouldn't even come close to adding up to the 1 billion test kits ordered).

@不，现在是第四次测试。目前还不清楚这是否是一次性的，也不可能是一次性的（数字甚至不能接近订购的10亿个测试套件的总和）。

@fartleksburpees @xuchuanmei @Gab_H_R "Ruled out" is the operative phrase here. You can't really rule out transmission on frozen packages. You can say you couldn't find virus on any of the packages you tested, or surfaces in the warehouse. But package there a week or two earlier wouldn't be any more.

@“排除”是这里的操作短语。你不能完全排除冷冻包裹的传播。你可以说在你测试的任何一个软件包上，或者在仓库的表面上都找不到病毒。但提前一两周到达那里的包裹再也没有了。

@JusticeInMed @thehouseofpod The control in this case is telling them to do what they were already doing, or even not telling them anything at all. In practice that will often be not masking.
I don't agree with the ethical assessment here.

@在本案中，控制人告诉他们做他们已经在做的事情，甚至什么都不告诉他们。实际上，这通常不是掩蔽。
我不同意这里的道德评估。

@JusticeInMed @thehouseofpod How is it unethical if the status quo in that particular school/community is few or no masks?

@JusticeInMed@thehouseofpod如果某个学校/社区的现状很少或没有面具，那怎么会是不道德的？

@gfodor @farid__jalali No you're not. There are NO (as in literally, precisely ZERO) child-sized N95s.

@gfodor@farid\uuuu jalali不，你不是。没有儿童大小的N95（确切地说是零）。

@fartleksburpees @xuchuanmei @Gab_H_R It was "ruled out" at the time (tests of surfaces in the warehouse all negative, etc.) but the origin was never identified. No genomic match with any other case ever seen in NZ (including traveler quarantine). The source of the cluster remains "under investigation" to this day.

@fartleksburpees@xuchuanmei@Gab_H_R当时被“排除”在外（仓库表面测试均为阴性等），但从未确定来源。在新西兰没有发现与任何其他病例（包括旅行者检疫）相匹配的基因组。迄今为止，该集群的来源仍在“调查中”。

@Emachine4230 @Lucypurr12 @Gab_H_R People also don't necessarily wash their hands all that well even when they do. If you wear gloves and avoid touching your face while wearing the gloves, once you remove the gloves, it's gone. Should still wash hands though.

@Emachine4230@Lucypurr12@Gab_H_R人们也不一定洗手洗得那么好，即使洗手了。如果你戴着手套，并避免在戴手套时触摸你的脸，一旦你摘下手套，它就不见了。但还是应该洗手。

@fartleksburpees @xuchuanmei @Gab_H_R The statement was *not* proven not to be true. Therefore *not* "debunked".
Reality: NZ *might* have had a case of imported frozen food causing an outbreak.
I actually think it is likely, you may disagree.
But, agree, never proven.

@fartleksburpees@xuchuanmei@Gab_H_R这句话被证明是不真实的。因此，*不是*“揭穿”。
事实：新西兰*可能*有一起进口冷冻食品引发疫情的案例。
我实际上认为这是可能的，你可能不同意。
但是，我同意，这一点从未得到证实。

@fartleksburpees @xuchuanmei @Gab_H_R Debunked is itself a claim calling for burden of proof.
"Unproven" would be accurate.

@法特莱克斯·波比@xuchuanmei@Gab_H_R被揭穿本身就是一个要求举证责任的主张。
“未经证实”是准确的。

@Lucypurr12 By official rules? Depends who you are and where you live, maybe never.
Israel has been giving them to 60+ and HCW four months after the third dose. US gives a 4th dose to immunocompromised six months after third.

@Lucypurr12按官方规定？取决于你是谁，住在哪里，也许永远不会。
以色列在第三次给药四个月后一直给他们注射60+和HCW。美国在第三次注射六个月后给免疫功能低下的患者第四次注射。

@fartleksburpees @xuchuanmei @Gab_H_R It wasn't debunked. The source was never identified and it was deemed a "coincidence" the the outbreak happened at a frozen food warehouse.

@fartleksburpees@xuchuanmei@Gab_____R这件事没有被揭穿。源头从未被确认，疫情发生在一家冷冻食品仓库被认为是“巧合”。

@tomaspueyo @toba More like 30-50x with delta, probably, but hard to measure precisely. Most areas hit by delta had vaccines, young populations and/or poor testing/data. Anyway this doesn't change the conclusion.

@托巴省的tomaspueyo更像是30-50倍的三角洲，但很难精确测量。受三角洲影响的大多数地区都有疫苗、年轻人口和/或较差的检测/数据。无论如何，这不会改变结论。

@JReinerMD He deleted it when he lined his pockets selling quack cures years ago.

@几年前，当他在兜里兜售庸医时，他删除了它。

@farid__jalali @RadCentrism A broadly prosperous economy is actually not the goal.

@farid__jalali@radcentralism一个广泛繁荣的经济实际上不是目标。

@Incindery1 Everyone around him is required to wear an N95, meanwhile CDC says wear whatever the hell you want.

@事实上，他周围的每个人都必须穿N95，同时疾病预防控制中心说，你想穿什么就穿什么。

@lpolovets Correct. The way the program was structured was an enormous rip off.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@这是正确的。这个项目的结构是一个巨大的骗局。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...