用户 aeon(@ AeonCoin) 的最新消息

@bascule @KirinDave If you regularly receive funds you didn't ask for, such that it requires "examining" you're luckier than I am.
If I receive some out-of-the-blue 0.00000012 to some address I used a while back, instant lock, done.

@bascule@KirinDave如果你经常收到你没有要求的资金,以至于需要“检查”你比我幸运。
如果我收到一些出乎意料的0.00000012到我之前使用的某个地址,即时锁定,完成。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@KirinDave @bascule Not every transaction, just receiving funds you didn't ask for. For most people that never happens. Also, for obvious reasons these mystery sends are usually very tiny, and easy to identify/block. Exception is open donation addresses that used to be more common. Those are unsafe.

@KirinDave@bascule不是每笔交易,只是收到了你没有要求的资金。对大多数人来说,这永远不会发生。此外,由于显而易见的原因,这些神秘的信息通常非常微小,并且容易识别/屏蔽。例外情况是开放式捐赠地址,过去更常见。这些是不安全的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@carico28 @ColinDotNet @choo_ek And the school thing is nonsense too. If he wants to stay home, he's not the one deciding whether children go to school. Again, neither he nor anyone else has any obligation to go a restaurant, and never did. Take up your school gripes with policy makers.

@carico28@ColinDotNet@choo_ek和学校的事情也是无稽之谈。如果他想待在家里,他不是决定孩子们是否上学的人。同样,他和其他任何人都没有义务去餐馆,而且从来没有。向政策制定者抱怨你的学校。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@carico28 @ColinDotNet @choo_ek The waitress paying her bills isn't his problem. He has no obligation to go to restaurant if he doesn't want to. She can either serve other customers or get another job, perhaps doing delivery or servicing pickup.

@carico28@ColinDotNet@choo_ek服务员付账不是他的问题。如果他不想去,他没有义务去餐馆。她既可以为其他客户服务,也可以找另一份工作,也许是送货或服务接送。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@jennnloveslove @ColinDotNet @choo_ek https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@carico28 @ColinDotNet @choo_ek He's reducing their risk too. First, directly (delivery is lower risk than in person service) and second indirectly by not contributing to overall community transmission rates.

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@jennloveslove@ColinDotNet@choo_ekhttps://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@carico28@ColinDotNet@choo_ek他也在降低他们的风险。首先是直接的(提供服务的风险低于亲自服务),其次是间接的,不影响整体社区传播率。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@carico28 @ColinDotNet @choo_ek He's reducing their risk too. First, directly (delivery is lower risk than in person service) and second indirectly by not contributing to overall community transmission rates.

@carico28@ColinDotNet@choo_ek他也在降低他们的风险。首先是直接的(提供服务的风险低于亲自服务),其次是间接的,不影响整体社区传播率。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@goldnecklace2 @ColinDotNet @choo_ek That's not outsourcing risk, it's reducing everyone's risk.
Being a restaurant delivery driver is a lower risk job than serving tables, and that's ignoring the effect of reducing ones contribution to overall community transmission.

@goldnecklace2@ColinDotNet@choo_ek这不是外包风险,而是降低每个人的风险。
做餐馆送货司机的风险比做服务生的风险要低,这忽略了减少自己对整个社区传播的贡献的影响。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@bascule @KirinDave This only works with naive users (albeit that's a lot). I've received mystery transactions like this and I always just lock the outputs and forget about them.

@bascule@KirinDave这只适用于天真的用户(尽管这是很多)。我收到过这样的神秘交易,我总是锁定输出,然后忘记它们。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JCTIV @ScottGottliebMD This is old data and probably depends on community vaccination rate. NY is higher than average.

@JCTIV@ScottGottliebMD这是旧数据,可能取决于社区接种率。纽约高于平均水平。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DiviLLogan2 @benwakana46 @aetiology 0.3 micron is just the least filtered size. Both larger and smaller are filtered more.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

@DiviLLogan2@benwakana46@aetiology 0.3微米只是最小的过滤尺寸。无论是大的还是小的都会被过滤得更多。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@tameneutral @fitterhappierAJ @jklmd123 None of these implies it's not worse.

@tameneutral@fitterhappierAJ@jklmd123这些都不意味着情况没有恶化。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@_Me_Three @JReinerMD I'm explaining so you understand better, not telling you what to do.

@_我解释是为了让你更好地理解,而不是告诉你该怎么做。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@jklmd123 @CDCgov Political interference (remember when that was a bad hing?) driven by a galaxy brain calculation that this will help with the midterms. That's it.

@jklmd123@CDCgov政治干预(还记得那是什么时候吗?)受galaxy brain计算的驱动,这将有助于期中考试。就这样。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@_Me_Three @JReinerMD It's called making tradeoffs, rather than extreme absolutism. No cost to wearing a mask in some situations so you might as well. Maybe someone is leaving the restaurant right as you arrive and you avoid infecting that person.

@_Me_Three@JReinerMD这叫做权衡,而不是极端的绝对主义。在某些情况下戴口罩不需要花钱,所以你也可以戴口罩。也许有人在你刚到的时候就离开了餐厅,你避免了感染那个人。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@AssociatesFirst @JReinerMD Good ones are, to a point.

@在一定程度上,AssociatesFirst@jrinermd是好的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@jklmd123 @fitterhappierAJ @RogerGustafsso2 Came to say that
Assessment: "Realistic possibility" https://t.co/lsPmAgovmH

@jklmd123@fitterhappierAJ@RogerGustafsso2是来这么说的
评估:“现实可能性”https://t.co/lsPmAgovmH

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Noahpinion That's not wacky.
It's wacky that it might be considered wacky.

@没什么奇怪的。
奇怪的是,这可能被认为是古怪的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JorgeStolfi @lopp ... or...hear me out...the organizations they actually do want to support (pedo rings likely do cross party lines, unfortunately).

@JorgeStolfi@lopp。。。或听我说完。。。他们真正想要支持的组织(不幸的是,佩多集团可能会跨越党派界限)。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@tylerblack32 @VanGennepD @NewYorker Curious how it almost disappeared during the pandemic.

@tylerblack32@VanGennepD@NewYorker好奇它是如何在大流行期间几乎消失的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@BailieCandace @caramelcoat8dme @uche_blackstock https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@PoliticsOnMyMnd @caramelcoat8dme She's working for the white house to "shape public opinion". It's never disclosed on the TV, which itself is unethical.
https://www.politico.com/newsl... https://t.co/mtF77UVgTG

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

Bailecandace@caramelcoat8dme@uche_blackstockhttps://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@PoliticsOnMyMnd@caramelcoat8dme她为白宫工作是为了“塑造公众舆论”。它从未在电视上公开,这本身就是不道德的。
https://www.politico.com/newsl... https://t.co/mtF77UVgTG

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情