用户 aeon(@ AeonCoin) 的最新消息

@GerberKawasaki @alexqgb Not known until you have some idea what situation follows his demise.

@GerberKawasaki@alexqgb直到你知道他去世后的情况。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ryanhealy @kittenishhh @RUOligarchJets I don't think you actually meant that.

@ryanhealy@kittenishhh@RUOligarchJets我不认为你真的是那个意思。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@TheSkylineTrail @wsbgnl Only 5 days elapsed too. I didn't notice that at first.

@wsbgnl的SkylineTrail也只过了5天。一开始我没注意到。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@TheSkylineTrail @wsbgnl Quite similar to 2200 deaths per day being too soon but 1900 deaths per day not.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@AbraarKaran Also in this clip she cites 2200 deaths per day in the US as not being the right time to drop mask guidance. CDC did so on a day with a 7-day average of 1900. I guess 2200 is terrible but 1900 is just fine.
Or, more likely, she was pressured into making the change on a schedule.

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@wsbgnl的SkylineTrail与每天2200人的死亡人数非常相似,这太快了,但每天1900人的死亡人数却没有。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@AbraarKaran在这段视频中还提到,美国每天有2200人死亡,这不是放弃口罩指导的正确时机。美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)以平均7天1900天的数据进行了调查。我想2200点很糟糕,但1900点很好。
或者,更有可能的是,她被迫按计划做出改变。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Gab_H_R Real time traffic? That seemed pretty dangerous to me.

@Gab_H_R实时流量?这对我来说很危险。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@alexmeshkin EU, UK, and Japan also imposing major sanctions. Even if, improbably, US were neutral, would still be enough.

@欧盟、英国和日本也实施了重大制裁。即使美国不太可能保持中立,也足够了。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@alexmeshkin If sanctions are considered a form of warfare, as some argue, we're certainly in one.

@如果制裁被认为是战争的一种形式,正如一些人所说,那么我们肯定是一种形式。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@TheSkylineTrail @wsbgnl Is there reporting on threatened? I haven't seen it, but don't find it surprising?

@wsbgnl的SkylineTrail有关于威胁的报道吗?我没见过,但你不觉得奇怪吗?

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@mgerrydoyle Did see a video of a drone hit

@mgerrydoyle确实看到了无人机被击中的视频

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@SuitsTracey @jeff_thompson @MeetJess Oh didn't see that, just saw US mentioned in your reply. Might be off base.

@SuitsTracey@jeff_thompson@MeetJess Oh没有看到这一点,只是看到了您在回复中提到的我们。可能是跑垒了。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@TaniaJSpencer @DrNeilStone That's true, some people do have those. Almost all bots do because it is much harder to create 10,000 or 100,000 accounts with carefully chosen names.

@TaniaJSpencer@DrNeilStone这是真的,有些人确实有。几乎所有的机器人都会这样做,因为用精心选择的名字创建1万或10万个帐户要困难得多。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@wsbgnl @TheSkylineTrail Pretty clear IMO. Of course, not everyone may have seen it or recognized it.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/31...

@wsbgnl@TheSkylineTrail在我看来非常清晰。当然,不是每个人都看到或认识到它。
https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/31...

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@WinterPollan @JeromeAdamsMD @CDCgov @cdc They literally may not have had a choice besides resignation, in which case someone else gets installed who does what the political leadership wants.
But that doesn't justify anyone else trying to make excuses for it. Call it out for what it is.

@WinterPollan@JeromeAdamsMD@CDCgov@cdc除了辞职,他们几乎没有其他选择,在这种情况下,其他人会被任命为政治领导层想要的人。
但这并不能证明其他人有理由为它找借口。说出它是什么。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@michaelbirnbaum Ukraine can probably get some foreign pilots, as with other foreigners volunteering, but still needs to be able to service and maintain the planes, perhaps a bigger issue.

@和其他志愿者一样,michaelbirnbaum Ukraine可能会雇佣一些外国飞行员,但仍然需要能够为飞机提供服务和维护,这可能是一个更大的问题。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@OrangeInvasion @SuitsTracey @jeff_thompson @MeetJess https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@SuitsTracey @jeff_thompson @MeetJess I think he meant personal lockdown, which is all the US ever really had.

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@orangeinvasion@suitstracey@jeff thompson@meetjesshttps://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@SuitsTracey@jeff_thompson@MeetJess我想他指的是个人封锁,这是美国真正拥有的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@SuitsTracey @jeff_thompson @MeetJess I think he meant personal lockdown, which is all the US ever really had.

@SuitsTracey@jeff_thompson@MeetJess我想他指的是个人封锁,这是美国真正拥有的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@s_murphy_md @JeromeAdamsMD It was a political consultant.

@s_murphy_md@JeromeAdamsMD这是一位政治顾问。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JeromeAdamsMD The middle isn't the main point here. It's all the people and institutions who do listen, and that's a lot.
Give good information and advice first. Subordinating that to trying to influence is corrosive to credibility (if, indeed, there is any left, which is debatable).

@JeromeAdamsMD中间并不是重点。所有的人和机构都在倾听,这是很多。
首先给出好的信息和建议。将其屈从于试图施加影响是对信誉的腐蚀(如果确实存在任何遗留问题,这是有争议的)。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JeromeAdamsMD Yes, there is political interference.
And yes it should be called out when it results in bad information and bad advice.

@是的,有政治干预。
是的,当它导致糟糕的信息和糟糕的建议时,它应该被叫出。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情