用户 aeon(@ AeonCoin) 的最新消息

@MicahPollak @ocnj3 @merry_seas @NKinNewEng @greg_travis I think the left edge is misleadingly truncated too. There was a period in summer 2020 when transmission was low as well.

@MicahPollak@ocnj3@merry_seas@NKinNewEng@greg_travis我认为左边缘也被错误地截断了。2020年夏天有一段时间,传播率也很低。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@MicahPollak @ocnj3 @merry_seas @NKinNewEng @greg_travis That looks fine to me from a policy perspective. Most if not all of that time period, transmission was high enough to be recommending that people wear masks. If they don't listen, then they don't, but it's a perfectly reasonable RECOMENDATION.

@MicahPollak@ocnj3@merry_seas@NKinNewEng@greg_travis从政策角度来看,这对我来说很好。在这段时间里,如果不是全部的话,大多数人的感染率都很高,因此建议人们戴口罩。如果他们不听,他们也不听,但这是一个完全合理的建议。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@MicahPollak @wsbgnl @theonlycsbv The old metric was a few weeks away dropping mask recommendation in a large portion of the country. Moving up the calendar by a few weeks isn't anything close to a policy necessity.

@MicahPollak@wsbgnl@theonlycsbv这一旧指标几周后就会在全国大部分地区取消口罩推荐。将日程提前几周并不是政策上的必然。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@CYirush @RegStrategist @TracyBethHoeg @DL_138 There is really no place without mitigations so this is meaningless, but it also went away in places without covid, so viral interference can't be the whole story either.

@CYirush@RegStrateriar@TracyBethHoeg@DL_138真的没有地方没有缓解措施,所以这是毫无意义的,但它也在没有新冠病毒的地方消失了,所以病毒干扰也不可能是全部。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@wsbgnl @MicahPollak @theonlycsbv It's political cover to take off masks (we're following CDC guidance!) at the State of the Union and display something that looks normal. At least the timing is motivated by that, there really shouldn't be any doubt.

@wsbgnl@MicahPollak@theonlycsbv摘下口罩是政治掩护(我们遵循CDC的指导!)在国情咨文上展示一些看起来很正常的东西。至少这个时机是出于这个原因,真的不应该有任何疑问。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@MicahPollak @wsbgnl @theonlycsbv Dude. https://t.co/9vDtT3Hauu

@MicahPollak@wsbgnl@theonlycsbv都德。https://t.co/9vDtT3Hauu

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@LimaBertuzzo @YoDammit @BNONews @lookner @Maxar I only see one lane being used in the image.

@LimaBertuzzo@YoDammit@BNONews@lookner@Maxar我在图片中只看到一条车道。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Gab_H_R Um, this is turning into a meme...

@Gab_H_R嗯,这正在变成一个迷因。。。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@LimaBertuzzo @YoDammit @BNONews @lookner @Maxar More than 5m per truck. Consider larger vehicles, the space in between, and look at the top right where there is even more space.

@LimaBertuzzo@YoDammit@BNONews@lookner@Maxar每辆卡车超过500万辆。考虑更大的车辆,空间之间,看看右上角,那里有更多的空间。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@AMGarvey @gorskon @thereal_truther Scratch a lot of them and you find a troll farm.

@AMGarvey@gorskon@thereal_truther抓了很多,你会发现一个巨魔农场。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@justin_ferello @YoDammit @BNONews @lookner @Maxar Vehicles aren't that close together. I estimate more like 3k, and maybe less (see wide spacing upper right of image).

@justin_ferello@YoDammit@BNONews@lookner@Maxar的车辆并没有那么近。我估计更像3k,也许更少(见图片右上角的宽间距)。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@BiasSelf @zanfr @MatTitoLandry @MeetJess Post exposure is PEP, PrEP is pre-exposure, say before going to a party.
PEP might work if there is good access to testing and contact tracing (even if done by individuals), but PrEP isn't very useful because the virus is everywhere, not just in narrow high risk situations.

@BiasSelf@zanfr@MatTitoLandry@MeetJess曝光后是PEP,准备是曝光前,比如说去派对前。
如果能够很好地进行检测和接触者追踪(即使是由个人进行),PEP可能会起作用,但PrEP并不是很有用,因为病毒无处不在,而不仅仅是在狭窄的高风险情况下。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@zanfr @MatTitoLandry @MeetJess There are some exceptionally high risk situation where it might help, say attending a large party, but if circulating prevalence is moderate to high, most people are going to be regularly exposed in everyday situations (work, school, smaller social activities, etc.), too.

@zanfr@MatTitoLandry@MeetJess有一些非常高的风险情况可能会有所帮助,比如参加大型派对,但如果循环流行率为中到高,大多数人也会定期暴露在日常环境中(工作、学校、小型社交活动等)。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@perdidostschool @Debs_Kropotkin @MarkLevineNYC @NYCSchools Certainly not past the next election.

@perdidostschool@Debs_Kropotkin@marklevinyc@NYCSchools肯定不会通过下一次选举。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@isaxamuelsson @spectatorindex Google "40 miles in km"

@Isaxamuelson@ObservatorIndex谷歌“40英里公里”

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@_DavidSFreeman @LukeDashjr @planche_btc @ercwl Bitcoin, kicking the hornet's nest since 2010.

@_DavidSFreeman @LukeDashjr @planche_btc @ercwl 比特币,自 2010 年以来一直在踢马蜂窝。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@BenDelecto @thereal_truther Also, let's not forget the calls to "reopen" for months after everything was open.
In short, reality doesn't even matter. There will still be crying about mandates and restrictions when there are literally none, instead of almost none.

@BenDelecto@thereal_truther还有,我们不要忘记在一切开放后几个月里“重新开放”的呼吁。
简而言之,现实并不重要。在几乎没有授权和限制的情况下,仍然会有人哭喊授权和限制。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@BenDelecto @thereal_truther All the time they were saying that, most western governments were dropping restrictions at every opportunity, and often against scientific advice. Sure in some cases they returned with worsening conditions, but that doesn't suggest, at all, an agenda of permanent "control").

@BenDelecto@thereal_truther他们一直在说,大多数西方政府都在利用一切机会取消限制,而且往往违背科学建议。当然,在某些情况下,他们带着恶化的情况返回,但这根本不意味着一个永久“控制”的议程。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@lionel_rich1 @HelenBranswell At the high end it is 75% which is okay, not great, and it's unlikely that the true number is right at the high end.

@lionel_rich1@HelenBranswell在高端,这是75%,这是可以的,不是很好,而且真正的数字不太可能在高端。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@MissyKhamvongsa @HelenBranswell It's different data, but similarly low effectiveness.

@MissyKhamvongsa@HelenBranswell这是不同的数据,但同样有效性很低。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情