用户 aeon(@ AeonCoin) 的最新消息

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 Oh, it's quite possible, but risk is not absolute. Restaurants and similar outdoors seems to be quite low risk, especially if not ultra crowded. I don't personally know of ANY instances of someone getting infected that way, but I'm sure it's happened. Again, all degree.

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 哦,这很有可能,但风险不是绝对的。餐馆和类似的户外活动似乎风险很低,尤其是如果不是非常拥挤的话。我个人不知道有人以这种方式感染的任何实例,但我确信它已经发生了。再次,所有学位。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@vardaanbhat @FinchTH @BlueShieldCA Curious to see if that works!
If not, you might need to try a customer service line, phone tree, etc. And those generally suck! Good luck.

@vardaanbhat @FinchTH @BlueShieldCA 想知道这是否有效!
如果没有,您可能需要尝试客户服务热线、电话树等。这些通常很糟糕!祝你好运。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 There are some people in this group who did get covid, generally by deciding at one time or another to be less cautious (e.g. work party, got from college roommate, etc.). But guess what? Didn't pass it on even to immediate family. Again, it's a choice how to approach risk.

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 这个群体中有些人确实感染了新冠病毒,通常是因为有时决定不那么谨慎(例如工作聚会,从大学室友那里得到等等)。但猜猜怎么了?甚至没有传给直系亲属。同样,如何应对风险也是一种选择。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 If you choose to roll the dice with a poorly understood rapidly changing virus 1-2 times per year, go right ahead. I'm all for personal choice within reason. But it's a choice.

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 如果您选择每年 1-2 次用一种了解甚少的快速变化的病毒来掷骰子,那就继续吧。我完全是出于个人的合理选择。但这是一个选择。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 Beg to differ. Not "all" getting this virus 1-2 times per year. If you try, you can get it a lot less than that. In my circle there is almost no covid in 3 years, despite socializing (safely), going to bars and restaurants (outdoors), even high risk jobs (w/good mask).

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 求不同。不是“所有人”每年都会感染这种病毒 1-2 次。如果你尝试,你能得到的比这少得多。在我的圈子里,尽管社交(安全)、去酒吧和餐馆(户外),甚至是高风险工作(戴好口罩),但在我的圈子里,3 年内几乎没有新冠病毒。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@jonovision_man @CoronaReduit @ChGefaell The whole thing is absurd
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@siilinoor @CoronaReduit @chefofmembers @ChGefaell Be aware this isn't even for the full year. It is a cherry picked four month period out of each year.

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@jonovision_man @CoronaReduit @ChGefaell 整个事情都是荒谬的
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@siilinoor @CoronaReduit @chefofmembers @ChGefaell 请注意,这甚至不是全年。这是每年四个月的樱桃采摘期。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@vardaanbhat @FinchTH @BlueShieldCA The issue here is, they may have set up a process for costs with no up front cost, but make it difficult for you to find. Be persistent.
https://www.cms.gov/how-to-get... https://t.co/0Qyk1ZkWyz

@vardaanbhat @FinchTH @BlueShieldCA 这里的问题是,他们可能已经建立了一个没有预付费用的成本流程,但让你很难找到。坚持不懈。
https://www .cms.gov/how-to-get... https://t.co/0Qyk1ZkWyz

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@vardaanbhat @FinchTH @BlueShieldCA No idea, you'll have to ask them. They probably have a partner because if they don't you can get reimbursed for really expensive tests (and better) like Lucira, and most insurers don't want to do that. With a pathway for direct payment they can cap the reimbursement at $12/test.

@vardaanbhat @FinchTH @BlueShieldCA 不知道,你得问问他们。他们可能有一个合作伙伴,因为如果他们不这样做,您可以获得像 Lucira 这样的非常昂贵的测试(甚至更好)的报销,而大多数保险公司不想这样做。通过直接付款的途径,他们可以将报销限制在 12 美元/次。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@LGray15 @mtracey Nope, he won't.

@LGray15 @mtracey 不,他不会。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@strxwmxn @mtracey No, he doesn't.

@strxwmxn @mtracey 不,他没有。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 Offit really only questions the 3rd/etc. shot for people who are both very healthy (incl not obese) and young. If you're in that category, your risk is really low regardless of doses. For everyone else, he recognizes that it is an effective three dose vaccine for severe disease.

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 Offit 真的只质疑第三个/等等。为非常健康(包括不肥胖)和年轻的人拍摄。如果您属于该类别,则无论剂量如何,您的风险都非常低。对于其他所有人,他承认这是一种有效的治疗严重疾病的三剂疫苗。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 That's literally survivorship bias. Three doses clearly more effective than two. You got slightly lucky (I assume only slightly because you're probably pretty low risk no matter how many doses).

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 这实际上是幸存者偏见。三剂明显比两剂更有效。你有点幸运(我假设只是因为无论服用多少剂量,你的风险都可能相当低)。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@spooknine Don't forget the nuclear risk and other risks of some alternative policy path. It's selectively and deceptively ignored by the dude you just quoted.

@spooknine 不要忘记某些替代政策路径的核风险和其他风险。你刚才引用的那个家伙选择性地和欺骗性地忽略了它。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 3 doses w/China vaccine clearly better than 2 doses mRNA at this point (Omicron) too.

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 3 剂中国疫苗在这一点上也明显优于 2 剂 mRNA(Omicron)。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 No. Look at the numbers. Unvaxed old people is a problem. Fully vaxed people (3 doses), whether old or not, is not ideal, some still die, but not really different from anywhere else.
https://twitter.com/MarionKoop...

https://www.medrxiv.org/conten... Important data from HongKong, showing increasing levels of protection from symptomatic and severe disease for the different vaccines in use. Coronavac lower for 2 dose, but at similar level as BNT162b2 for three doses. Vaccines work. https://t.co/JF2KKjsLlN

发表时间:4年前 作者:Marion Koopmans @MarionKoopmans

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 不。看看数字。未打疫苗的老人是个问题。完全接种疫苗的人(3 剂),无论是否老,都不理想,有些人仍然死亡,但与其他任何地方并没有真正的不同。
https://twitter.com/MarionKoop...

https://www.medrxiv.org/conten...来自香港的重要数据显示,使用中的不同疫苗对症状性和严重疾病的防护水平不断提高。Coronavac在2剂中较低,但在三剂中与BNT162b2的水平相似。疫苗有效。https://t.co/JF2KKjsLlN

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 @CoronaReduit It's an appropriate response to stupidity.

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 @CoronaReduit 这是对愚蠢的适当回应。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 Old people not vaxed is a real problem yes. But the vaccines are fine. Look at the numbers and stop repeating bullshit because you hear other people saying it.

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 没有被打晕的老人是一个真正的问题。但是疫苗没问题。看看数字,不要再胡说八道了,因为你听到其他人这么说。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 @CoronaReduit On top of being absurd in every way, it ignores that those months are winter in the southern hemisphere and summer in the northern, and biggest surges are usually in winter...

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 @CoronaReduit 除了在各方面都很荒谬之外,它忽略了那几个月是南半球的冬天和北半球的夏天,而最大的浪涌通常是在冬天......

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 @CoronaReduit STOP CHERRY PICKING FOUR MONTHS OUT OF EACH OF THREE YEARS.

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 @CoronaReduit 每三年停止采摘樱桃四个月。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 @CoronaReduit @once Their vax does not suck, it's basically the same w/3 doses, and that cherry picked chart pulling four months out of each year is ridiculous.
https://twitter.com/MarionKoop...

https://www.medrxiv.org/conten... Important data from HongKong, showing increasing levels of protection from symptomatic and severe disease for the different vaccines in use. Coronavac lower for 2 dose, but at similar level as BNT162b2 for three doses. Vaccines work. https://t.co/JF2KKjsLlN

发表时间:4年前 作者:Marion Koopmans @MarionKoopmans

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 @CoronaReduit @once 他们的 vax 不烂,基本上是相同的,每 3 剂,而且每年抽出四个月的樱桃采摘图表是荒谬的。
https://twitter.com/MarionKoop...

https://www.medrxiv.org/conten...来自香港的重要数据显示,使用中的不同疫苗对症状性和严重疾病的防护水平不断提高。Coronavac在2剂中较低,但在三剂中与BNT162b2的水平相似。疫苗有效。https://t.co/JF2KKjsLlN

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情