@farid__jalali According to CDC 75% of kids in US have antibodies. A 75-25 split is certainly enough to measure a correlation.
@根据疾控中心的数据，75%的美国儿童有抗体。75-25的分割当然足以衡量相关性。
用户 aeon(@ AeonCoin) 的最新消息
@MarxyMark1918 @Incindery1 https://www.washingtonpost.com...
@marxymark1918@incindery1https://www.washingtonpost.com...
@HFentonMudd @stargazing90 @CovidDataReport Wastewater suggests that the rise is mostly escaping reporting and is approaching delta surge levels.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@CovidDataReport It's also clear that the rise is not well captured by reported testing.
Wastewater (dark) vs reported (light) from https://biobot.io/ https://t.co/5zx7WSHxTc
@HventonMudd@stargazing90@CovidDataReport废水表明，上升主要是逃避报告，正在接近三角洲激增水平。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@CovidDataReport也很明显，报告的测试并没有很好地捕捉到这种增长。
废水（暗）与报告的（光）https://biobot.io/ https://t.co/5zx7WSHxTc
@CovidDataReport It's also clear that the rise is not well captured by reported testing.
Wastewater (dark) vs reported (light) from https://biobot.io/ https://t.co/5zx7WSHxTc
@CovidDataReport也很明显，报告的测试并没有很好地捕捉到这种增长。
废水（暗）与报告的（光）https://biobot.io/ https://t.co/5zx7WSHxTc
@amorvincitomnia @flowermusickids @ChristosArgyrop Could have a role for specific situations e.g. attending a large wedding. But still seems less useful than PEP would be if it worked.
@amorvincitomnia@flowermusickids@ChristosArgyrop可能在特定情况下发挥作用，例如参加大型婚礼。但是，如果PEP有效的话，它似乎仍然不如PEP有用。
@jklmd123 @denise_dewald That plus long covid plus people who have a choice deciding not to work (e.g. retirees who could make it without work but work to get out of the hose and have extra income) due to the workplace being much more dangerous is the entire labor shortage.
@jklmd123@denise_dewald由于工作场所的危险性更大，再加上长时间的新冠病毒感染，再加上那些可以选择不工作的人（例如退休人员，他们可以不工作，但工作可以摆脱困境，获得额外收入），这就是整个劳动力短缺。
@deepbluecea @CovidDataReport It remains to be seen how long that holds up, but in reality, very few are on board, meaning more shots on the shelf than shots in arms. Another booster every few months seems to be a very hard sell (even for the FIRST booster, uptake is low).
@deepbluecea@CovidDataReport它能撑多久还有待观察，但实际上，船上很少有人，这意味着架子上的子弹比手臂上的子弹多。每隔几个月就有一个助推器似乎很难卖出（即使是第一个助推器，吸收率也很低）。
@deepbluecea @CovidDataReport You can't turn the clock back. For most of 2021 the efficacy was higher, and 90% reduction was a reasonable expectation. Now it is not.
@deepbluecea@CovidDataReport你不能让时光倒流。在2021的大部分时间里，疗效更高，减少90%是合理的预期。现在不是了。
@deepbluecea @CovidDataReport The fact is, the NUMBER of vaccinated deaths is very significant. i.e. among the leading causes of death all its own. Once you recognize this you can ignore all the nonsense about % of vaccinated vs unvaccinated deaths, base rate bias, Simpsons paradox, etc.
@deepbluecea@CovidDataReport事实是，接种疫苗的死亡人数非常显著。i、 e.死亡的主要原因之一。一旦你意识到这一点，你就可以忽略所有关于接种疫苗和未接种疫苗死亡百分比、基准率偏差、辛普森悖论等的废话。
@deepbluecea @CovidDataReport It applies, just not all that strongly. Efficacy is much lower than it used to be, even if measured carefully.
@deepbluecea@CovidDataReport适用，只是没有那么强烈。即使仔细衡量，疗效也远低于过去。
@AbraarKaran First widespread increase since..checks calendar...two months ago.
@AbraarKaran自…以来首次大范围增长。。检查日历。。。两个月前。
@boltyboy @StevenMathern @DataDrivenMD "Probably wouldn't" is not good enough, that's the case for almost everyone since 2020. Reducing say a 5% chance of a very bad outcome to 0.5% is very worthwhile.
@boltyboy@StevenMathern@DataDrivenMD“可能不会”还不够好，自2020年以来，几乎所有人都是这样。将非常糟糕结果的5%几率降低到0.5%是非常值得的。
@boltyboy @DataDrivenMD This study doesn't apply to you. The study showing that it reduces hospitalization and death in high risk symptomatic covid patients is unchanged.
@boltyboy@DataDrivenMD这项研究不适用于你。这项研究表明，它减少了有症状的高危新冠病毒患者的住院和死亡，但没有改变。
@kmaru1701 @GregWAutry A loan isn't necessarily affordable either.
@kmaru1701@Gregwatry贷款也不一定能负担得起。
@ibrake4ants @MissJupiter1957 @nbcchicago Nobody understands but still reports green, green, green.
@ibrake4ants@MissJupiter1957@NBCChago没有人理解，但仍然报告绿色，绿色，绿色。
@ILCitizen @JeromeAdamsMD They sort of have but it is very scattered, with much of the guidance still implying droplets.
@Ilcidentity@JeromeAdamsMD他们有点像，但它是非常分散的，大部分指导仍然暗示着水滴。
@cathleen28 @LazarusLong13 Yes as I noted at the time:
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@AbraarKaran It is extremely "odd" that something that was entirely an improvized solution to a shortage (cloth masks) persists as a solution. Shows extreme dysfunction.
The inconsistency with respirators being recommended (including by CDC) for wildfires EVEN RIGHT NOW is more illustration.
@cathleen28@LazarusLong13是的，正如我当时指出的：
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@AbraarKaran非常“奇怪”的是，一些完全是临时解决短缺的办法（布面具）仍然作为解决办法存在。表现出极度的功能障碍。
即使是现在，与野火防护口罩（包括CDC推荐的）的不一致更能说明问题。
@LazarusLong13 Similar to when CDC was telling people to use N95s for wildfires while at the very same time telling people not to use N95s for covid.
@LazarusLong13类似于CDC告诉人们在野火中使用N95s，同时告诉人们不要在新冠肺炎中使用N95s。