@Ikat0 @JMFischer @DavidElfstrom @Poppendieck @BlueairUS Nice in terms of no wiring, but: 1) it might be loud, 2) you'd need to figure out an efficient design accounting for pressure drop. (2) is harder than using a design someone else has worked out.

@Ikat0 @JMFischer @DavidElfstrom @Poppendieck @BlueairUS 在没有布线方面很好，但是：1）它可能很响，2）你需要找出一个有效的设计来考虑压降。 (2) 比使用别人设计的设计更难。

@fergal_whatever @Billius27 What is the mechanism of death in these cases?

@fergal_whatever @Billius27 这些病例的死亡机制是什么？

@kumar_g_ @alexmeshkin Yikes I had no idea it was that much.

@kumar_g_ @alexmeshkin 哎呀，我不知道有那么多。

@alexmeshkin @kumar_g_ There is some of that being done, but very slowly. Your point is a good one on scale. Could in some abstract sense power the entire planet I think. Of course not feasible in reality, and hard to even power the US given huge challenges of transmission and storage.

@alexmeshkin @kumar_g_ 有一些正在完成，但非常缓慢。你的观点在规模上是一个很好的观点。我认为可以在某种抽象意义上为整个星球提供动力。当然在现实中不可行，考虑到传输和存储的巨大挑战，甚至很难为美国提供动力。

@alexmeshkin There are a lot of states with good solar potential. US is blessed by low latitude overall, and an enormous, arid, often cloudless, southwest. Europe not so much.

@alexmeshkin 有很多州具有良好的太阳能潜力。美国得天独厚，整体纬度低，西南地区广阔，干旱，通常无云。欧洲没那么多。

@alexmeshkin Nope, the 35% is w/o large hydro and nuclear. Those add another 15%.
https://www.energy.ca.gov/data...

@alexmeshkin 不，35% 没有大型水电和核电。这些又增加了 15%。
https:// /www.energy.ca.gov/data...

@kumar_g_ @alexmeshkin Didn't know that about Greece. Fascinating.

@kumar_g_ @alexmeshkin 对希腊一无所知。迷人。

@alexmeshkin California is 35% right now (not including large hydro or nuclear which is still pretty clean) and it's higher than that if you charge during off peak. A lot of the NG usage is to support peaks.

@alexmeshkin California 现在是 35%（不包括仍然相当干净的大型水电或核电），如果您在非高峰时段充电，它会高于此。很多 NG 使用是为了支持峰值。

@BasedCr40558315 @katakiuchin @GearoidReidy Interesting points, thanks for sharing.

@BasedCr40558315 @katakiuchin @GearoidReidy 有趣的点，感谢分享。

@alexmeshkin Production issues and exporting externalities is 100% valid (not only for EVs though), but in terms of green energy, it doesn't have to be 100%. 99% would be fine, right? Where do you draw the line.

@alexmeshkin 生产问题和出口外部性是 100% 有效的（尽管不仅适用于电动汽车），但就绿色能源而言，它不一定是 100%。 99%就好了，对吧？你在哪里画线。

@BasedCr40558315 @katakiuchin @GearoidReidy Did that happen in Japan before covid?

@BasedCr40558315 @katakiuchin @GearoidReidy 在新冠病毒爆发之前在日本发生过这种情况吗？

@BasedCr40558315 @katakiuchin @GearoidReidy That isn't true about the masks, there are a lot of high quality masks/respirators (not all). You can go look on a webcam right now and see them.
Crowding is true. However, norm of not talking in crowded places helps a lot. Talking much riskier than mere quiet breathing.

@BasedCr40558315 @katakiuchin @GearoidReidy 口罩不是这样，有很多高质量的口罩/呼吸器（不是全部）。你现在可以去看看网络摄像头，看看他们。
拥挤是真的。然而，在拥挤的地方不说话的规范有很大帮助。说话比安静地呼吸要危险得多。

@BasedCr40558315 @katakiuchin @GearoidReidy There was a certain degree of mask wearing in Japan before covid, and will be after. See this story from 2017
https://japantoday.com/categor...

@BasedCr40558315 @katakiuchin @GearoidReidy 日本在covid之前有一定程度的口罩戴，以后也会戴。看看这个 2017 年的故事
https://japantoday.com /类别...

@katakiuchin @BasedCr40558315 @GearoidReidy LOL NO. Most of US/EU did not do "hard" lockdowns (especially not US). You have some good points about Japan measures not being optimally targeted, but what you just said here makes no sense.

@katakiuchin @BasedCr40558315 @GearoidReidy 哈哈。大多数美国/欧盟都没有进行“硬”封锁（尤其是美国没有）。你有一些关于日本措施没有成为最佳目标的观点，但你刚才所说的没有意义。

@TedsTechTed @GearoidReidy Only for a little while. Exponential growth will spread throughout a whole country if not contained once inevitably imported (as it was in Japan and everywhere else).
Border closure works ALONG WITH effective domestic control measures, but only with.

@TedsTechTed @GearoidReidy 只是一会儿。如果一旦不可避免地进口（就像在日本和其他地方一样），指数增长将蔓延到整个国家。
边境关闭与有效的国内控制措施相辅相成，但仅限于此。

@0minus_Prime @GennadySimanovs @DrEricDing @JPWeiland And yet...Multiple waves of infection (total 80% infected) with intermittent NPIs instituted over 18 months, 1 million dead in the US, 250K in UK w/NPIs.

@0minus_Prime @GennadySimanovs @DrEricDing @JPWeiland 然而……多波感染（总共 80% 感染）在 18 个月内采用间歇性 NPI，美国有 100 万人死亡，英国有 25 万人使用 NPI。

@0minus_Prime @GennadySimanovs @DrEricDing @JPWeiland I explained why you're wrong. There were certainly some errors (valid, and good to learn from), but the big picture played out almost exactly as modeled.

@0minus_Prime @GennadySimanovs @DrEricDing @JPWeiland 我解释了为什么你错了。肯定有一些错误（有效，值得学习），但总体情况几乎与模型完全一致。

@kknnaabb @_mbdr_ @ianmSC I could show you just such a graph, say comparing Florida with Taiwan (similar population and weather) in January 2021, and then label the Taiwan as 'masks' and Florida as 'no masks'. Is this valid? No.

@kknnaabb @_mbdr_ @ianmSC 我可以给你看这样一张图表，比如在 2021 年 1 月将佛罗里达与台湾（相似的人口和天气）进行比较，然后将台湾标记为“口罩”，将佛罗里达标记为“没有口罩”。这是有效的吗？不。

@kknnaabb @_mbdr_ @ianmSC Thank about it, if hypothetically NPIs did nothing, there would be random differences right. Some would show NPIs worked randomly due to some other unseen factor. Did you ever see that in his graphs? No. They're cherry picked to prove a point.

@kknnaabb @_mbdr_ @ianmSC 谢谢，如果假设 NPI 什么也没做，那么会有随机差异。有些人会显示 NPI 由于其他一些看不见的因素而随机工作。你在他的图表中看到过吗？不，他们是为了证明一个观点而被挑选出来的。

@kknnaabb @_mbdr_ @ianmSC His graphs are exactly the stupid A to B comparisons that don't account for other difference between A and B. They're also heavily cherry picked.

@kknnaabb @_mbdr_ @ianmSC 他的图表完全是愚蠢的 A 到 B 比较，没有考虑 A 和 B 之间的其他差异。它们也被大量挑选。