@GlennWa33737801 @DocJeffD In short, this virus, like many, is not good for you and those harms aren't limited to ~10 days of possible acute illness of varying severity from almost none to death.

@GlennWa33737801@DocJeffD简而言之，这种病毒和许多病毒一样，对你不好，这些危害不限于10天左右可能出现的急性疾病，严重程度从几乎没有到死亡不等。

@GlennWa33737801 @DocJeffD You may think that's what I mean, but in fact what I mean is studies looking at a lot of people who did and didn't test positive and finding that those who tested positive have worse health outcomes including strokes, heart attacks, brain abnormalities, kidney damage, etc.

@GlennWa33737801@DocJeffD你可能认为这就是我的意思，但事实上我的意思是，对许多检测呈阳性和未呈阳性的人进行研究，发现检测呈阳性的人健康状况更差，包括中风、心脏病发作、脑异常、肾损伤等。

@GlennWa33737801 @DocJeffD Sort of depends how you define symptoms. Early diabetes may not have any outward symptoms but you can test for it. Likewise reduced kidney function. Elevated resting heart rate is seen post-covid, also may not be noticed without measuring it.

@GlennWa33737801@DocJeffD某种程度上取决于你如何定义症状。早期糖尿病可能没有任何外观症状，但你可以进行检测。同样，肾功能降低。在冠状病毒感染后，静息心率升高，如果不进行测量，也可能不会被注意到。

@arcillahumeda @What46HasDone Moving from a solid red state to a swing state increases your influence.

@arcillahumeda@What46HasDone从纯红色状态移动到摇摆状态会增加你的影响力。

@alaw202 @wsbgnl @flyingfannie The Omicron wave was primarily December-February, not March when it had largely subsided. The US at least had VERY substantial excess death during that period, reasonably close to peak pandemic. https://t.co/fS3q46QrL6

@alaw202@wsbgnl@flyingfannie Omicron浪潮主要发生在12月至2月，而不是3月，当时它已基本消退。在这段时间里，美国至少有大量的超额死亡，相当接近大流行的高峰。https://t.co/fS3q46QrL6

@GlennWa33737801 @DocJeffD What part of increased risk of new systemic conditions after covid is hard to understand?

@GlennWa33737801@DocJeffD新冠肺炎后新系统性疾病风险增加的部分很难理解？

@GlennWa33737801 @DocJeffD Not sure what he meant but there are several studies showing increased risk of various health conditions some time after acute covid. That increased post-covid risk or even some of the resulting conditions (e.g. diabetes) may not have immediate symptoms.

@GlennWa33737801@DocJeffD不确定他的意思，但有几项研究表明，急性新冠病毒感染后一段时间内，各种健康状况的风险增加。增加的冠状病毒感染后风险，甚至导致的某些疾病（如糖尿病）可能不会立即出现症状。

@MayaPapaya323 @Samirkaji Most important is such a vague and subjective criterion that the claim doesn't mean anything.

@Mayapaya323@Samirkaji最重要的是，这是一个如此模糊和主观的标准，以至于这一主张没有任何意义。

@EricTopol @ScienceMagazine "Delta outcompeted Omicron without selection pressure"
Interesting.

@EricTopol@ScienceMagazine“Delta在没有选择压力的情况下击败了Omicron”
有趣的

@policytensor Kind of obvious, TBH. High yield = high risk of default = high dependance on business conditions.

@政策张量有点明显，待定。高收益=高违约风险=高度依赖商业条件。

@DaveAus23503512 @michaelmina_lab @CDCgov BinaxNOW is close to the worst test. I don't see why anyone should be using it at this point. It's just well known because it was available early.

@DaveAus23503512@michaelmina\u lab@CDCgov BinaxNOW接近最差测试。我不明白为什么现在有人应该使用它。这是众所周知的，因为它很早就有了。

@wsbgnl Did she push back against the early, and largely wrong, studies and anecdotes claiming Omicron to be mild? Possible, but I don't remember it.

@wsbgnl她是否反对早期的、基本上是错误的、声称奥米克罗温和的研究和轶事？可能吧，但我不记得了。

@DrWilliamKu @DrEricDing @Antonio_Caramia US is very large and aggregates hide a lot.

@DrWilliamKu@Drericing@Antonio\u Caramia US非常大，骨料隐藏了很多。

@EmeraldCityML @wsbgnl Would be nice to see some air cleaners assisting the masks, but alas just very crowded.

@EmeraldCityML@wsbgnl很高兴看到一些空气净化器协助面罩，但遗憾的是，这里非常拥挤。

@Zinnia1111 @MeetJess Required by some schools but relatively recent.

@Zinnia1111@MeetJess是一些学校要求的，但相对较新。

@slowerissafer @Noahpinion Why does a building even need a name?

@slowerissafer@Noahpinion为什么一栋建筑甚至需要一个名字？

@Michael59503746 @citeyourwork @wsbgnl @alexmeshkin Missing 40% means catching 60%, so still useful. We also don't know how contagious these symptomatic-but-testing-negative cases are.

@Michael59503746@citeyourwork@wsbgnl@alexmeshkin缺少40%意味着捕获60%，所以仍然有用。我们也不知道这些症状性但检测阴性的病例有多大的传染性。

@Marco_Piani @thereal_truther @ianmSC Delta was more severe too.

@Marco\u Piani@thereal\u truther@ianmSC Delta也更严重。

@ryan_landay Also refusing or quickly dropping empty middle seats after their industry study said empty middle seats cut (very substantial) transmission rates in half.

@ryan\u landay也拒绝或迅速放弃空置的中间座位，因为他们的行业研究表明，空置的中间座位将（非常大的）传输率降低了一半。

@DrEricDing @VoteAshcraft @TheWHN Does monkeypox vaccine provide any immunity to smallpox. We ought to consider at least as one factor that smallpox could return.

@猴痘疫苗对天花有免疫力吗。我们至少应该考虑天花可能复发的一个因素。