1/ Recently, a few community members (including some from TFL) have referred to the proposed new blockchain in Prop 1623 as a “fork” as opposed to a genesis chain.
Note: The revival plan is not proposing a “fork” of the existing chain, but rather the creation of a new one 🧵.
1/最近，一些社区成员（包括TFL的一些成员）将1623号提案中提议的新区块链称为“分叉”，而不是genesis链。
注：复兴计划并不是建议对现有链条进行“分叉”，而是创建一个新链条🧵.
2/ What is a fork?
A (hard) fork refers to a change in a blockchain protocol that results in two blockchains - one that follows the previous protocol & one that follows the new version. The new chain shares all of its previous history with the original.
什么是叉子？
（硬）分叉是指区块链协议中的变化，导致两个区块链-一个遵循之前的协议&；新版本之后的版本。这家新连锁店与原连锁店有着相同的历史。
2/ During $UST’s depeg, IBC channels were closed (but not disabled) as a stop-gap measure to prevent impermanent loss being incurred on $UST & $LUNA pools on @osmosiszone & other IBC DEXs. As a result, users were then unable to transfer these assets across IBC chains.
2/在$UST的depeg期间，IBC频道被关闭（但未禁用），作为权宜之计，以防止$UST&；遭受非永久性损失$@osmosiszone&；上的LUNA池；其他IBC指数。因此，用户无法跨IBC链转移这些资产。
3/ We are aware of the issues associated with this proposal & are working on getting the IBC channels open for users as soon as possible.
Stay on the lookout for future updates!
3/我们了解与此提案相关的问题；正在努力让IBC频道尽快为用户开放。
随时关注未来的更新！
1/ Prop 1299 to (re)enable IBC has passed but did not successfully execute due to technical issues. Namely, the proposal attempted to enable IBC transfers which were already enabled 🧵. https://t.co/mCgZyxu7O2
1/1299号提案（重新）启用IBC已通过，但由于技术问题，未能成功执行。也就是说，该提案试图启用已经启用的IBC传输🧵. https://t.co/mCgZyxu7O2
RT: To clarify, as I’ve noted multiple times i dont think sending tokens to this address to burn tokens is a good idea - nothing happens except that you lose your tokens
Want there to be no confusion whatsoever https://twitter.com/stablekwon...
RT：澄清一下，正如我多次指出的那样，我不认为向这个地址发送代币来烧掉代币是个好主意-除了丢失代币之外，什么都不会发生
希望没有任何混乱https://twitter.com/stablekwon...
RT: 1/ For those who would like to bridge $bETH off of Terra to Ethereum, here’s a 🧵 on how to send your $bETH from Terra to Ethereum & swap it for $stETH, which yields you a staking yield of ~3.8% APR.
RT：1/对于那些想将$bETH从Terra连接到以太坊的人，这里有一个🧵 如何将您的$bETH从Terra发送到以太坊&；将其兑换为stETH美元，这将为您带来约3.8%的押注收益率。
2/ A new prop (Prop 1747) has been posted with updated parameters. If passed, this proposal will burn the remaining $UST in the Community Pool + cross-chain liquidity incentive $UST. https://t.co/jvT4Tx74TR
2/发布了一个新道具（1747号道具），并更新了参数。如果通过，该提案将烧掉社区池中剩余的$UST+跨链流动性激励$UST。https://t.co/jvT4Tx74TR
1/ Prop 1188 to ‘Burn the remaining UST in community pool + cross-chain liquidity incentive UST’ passed but did not successfully execute due to technical issues - it attempted to burn more $UST from the pool than existed.
More info can be found here 👇
https://github.com/terra-money... https://twitter.com/stablechen...
Terra can't make it "disappear" - the vote passed and was executed automatically by the system. However the execution failed due to incorrect parameter (malformed proposal that was not caught by proposer).
We will have to redo the proposal.
I can check for validity. https://twitter.com/mikogiveaw...
1/1188号提案“烧掉社区池中剩余的UST+跨链流动性激励UST”获得通过，但由于技术问题，未能成功执行-它试图从池中烧掉比现有更多的美元UST。
更多信息可在此处找到👇
https://github.com/terra-money...https://twitter.com/stablechen...
Terra不能让它“消失”——投票通过，并由系统自动执行。但是，由于参数不正确（提案人未捕获到格式错误的提案），执行失败。
我们将不得不重新提出这个建议。
我可以检查有效性。https://twitter.com/mikogiveaw...
6/ Anyone interested in posting a viable governance proposal to be added on the allowlist are welcome to do so by submitting a pull request here 👇
https://github.com/terra-money...
6/任何有兴趣在许可列表上发布可行的治理方案的人，都可以在此处提交请求👇
https://github.com/terra-money...
7/ Note: The idea of increasing the $LUNA cost to post a proposal (to prevent scams/spam) has been discussed & is non-viable at this time. This option would take 7 days to pass through governance, in which time many scams/spam would continue to cause issues & losses.
7/注：已经讨论了增加LUNA发布提案的费用（以防止欺诈/垃圾邮件）的想法；此时不可行。此选项需要7天的时间才能通过治理，在此期间，许多欺诈/垃圾邮件将继续引发问题；损失。
8/ $LUNA’s price volatility also renders this non-viable as the cost to post a prop could end up as economically prohibitive for most.
8美元/LUNA的价格波动也使得这种做法不可行，因为对大多数人来说，张贴道具的成本最终可能在经济上令人望而却步。
9/ Please be on the lookout for scams & stay safe out there #LUNAtics!
9/请注意诈骗和；在外面保持安全#疯子！
4/ Our goal is not to censor viable proposals, but rather to protect users from scams & ensure an excellent user experience. For those who would like to view all proposals, including potential scams/spam, simply click the “Show all” button on the “Governance” page on Station. https://t.co/tRke3iyi8d
4/我们的目标不是审查可行的提案，而是保护用户免受欺诈；确保卓越的用户体验。对于那些想查看所有提案（包括潜在的欺诈/垃圾邮件）的人，只需单击Station“Governance”页面上的“Show all”按钮。https://t.co/tRke3iyi8d
5/ 🚨 IMPORTANT 🚨
Clicking on the “Show all” button may reveal potential scam proposals. Please beware of these types of posts to keep your funds safe.
5个/🚨 重要的🚨
单击“全部显示”按钮可能会显示潜在的诈骗提议。请注意这些类型的帖子，以确保您的资金安全。
3/ To prevent scams/spam & protect users, props will be added to an allowlist (visible after clicking on “Governance” on Station) at this point while we try to find a more sustainable solution in preventing these types of props from being posted on Terra’s Governance platform.
3/防止欺诈/垃圾邮件；保护用户，此时道具将添加到许可列表中（点击站点上的“治理”后可见），同时我们试图找到一个更可持续的解决方案，防止这些类型的道具发布在Terra的治理平台上。
2/ In addition, we have also seen a rapid increase in spam proposals as the discount on $LUNA made it economically cheap to post anything one desired. https://t.co/dd524u8ndk
2/此外，我们还看到垃圾邮件提案迅速增加，因为LUNA美元的折扣使得发布任何想要的内容都变得经济实惠。https://t.co/dd524u8ndk
1/ Recently, bad actors have been capitalizing on Terra-related events by purchasing $LUNA & posting fake proposals on Station with phishing sites quoted in the link. These proposals claim to lead users to a preview of Terra 2.0 & dApps launched by us - which is not the case.
1/最近，坏演员通过购买LUNA&；美元，利用Terra相关事件；在站点上发布虚假提议，链接中引用了钓鱼网站。这些提案声称将引导用户预览Terra 2.0和；我们推出的DAPP——事实并非如此。
5/ Introducing this new liquidity profile ensures that small $LUNA holders have similar initial liquidity profiles. This would cover 99.81% of $LUNA wallets while only representing 6.45% of total $LUNA at the Pre-attack snapshot.
5/引入这一新的流动性概况可确保小型LUNA美元持有人具有类似的初始流动性概况。这将覆盖99.81%的$LUNA钱包，而在攻击前快照中仅占$LUNA钱包总数的6.45%。
6/ 3. Decreasing distribution to post-attack $UST holders:
The allocation for post-attack $UST holders has decreased from 20% to 15% to ensure the de-peg related allocation is on par with the original stakeholder (pre-attack $LUNA) allocation.
6月3日。减少对攻击后$UST持有人的分配：
攻击后美元UST持有人的分配已从20%降至15%，以确保与脱钩相关的分配与原始利益相关者（攻击前美元LUNA）的分配持平。