And I am here for it. https://twitter.com/ew/status/...

我在这里就是为了这个。https://twitter.com/ew/status/...

@syndrome4ever @ACG_Crypto @taoblockchain @TwitterSupport @MestizaOfficial 🙏🙇‍♂️

@syndrome4ever@ACG_Crypto@Tao区块链@TwitterSupport@Mestizao官方🙏🙇‍♂️

@ACG_Crypto @syndrome4ever @taoblockchain and its easily discernible from the account activity.
no idea why @TwitterSupport allows it to continue

@ACG_Crypto@syndrome4ever@Tao区块链及其易于从账户活动中识别的特征。
不知道@TwitterSupport为什么允许它继续

@syndrome4ever @doingwhatidowel @ACG_Crypto fucking scammers

@syndrome4ever@doingwhatidowel@ACG_加密该死的骗子

@ACG_Crypto @syndrome4ever @taoblockchain is that metamask? make sure its the latest version

@ACG_Crypto@syndrome4ever@Tao区块链是元掩码吗？确保它是最新版本

@moonboi24 In fact, I get what you were saying now and you're absolutely correct none of those people would have been given the time of day back then.

@事实上，我明白你现在所说的，你是绝对正确的，那些人中没有一个会在那时得到时间。

@moonboi24 It's a politician and used car salesman skill: say what you want to say for the audience that is listening.
Works well in crypto, too.

@这是一个政治家和二手车推销员的技巧：对听众说你想说的话。
在加密方面也很有效。

@moonboi24 If you'd like some feedback, my double take wasn't because you were wrong in fact or intent, but that I wasn't in the same place intellectually because I focused on different things. When you connected my thoughts to yours, it all seemed in context and NOT as I perceived it.

@如果你想得到一些反馈，我的双重理解不是因为你在事实上或意图上是错误的，而是因为我在智力上不在同一个地方，因为我专注于不同的事情。当你把我的想法和你的联系起来时，这一切似乎都是在上下文中发生的，而不是我所意识到的。

@moonboi24 i refrained for a moment until i got where you were coming from lol

@我克制了一会儿，直到我明白了你的意思，哈哈

@moonboi24 preach

@登月布道

@moonboi24 how to put this... it's not that it isn't important or that nobody cares. clearly people care.
however it's not just 50,000 of us trading coins back in forth in a huge poker game.
There's 50,000,000 people a day now.
What is this in the grand scheme?
Nothing.

@这是怎么说的。。。这并不是说它不重要，也不是说没人在乎。显然，人们很关心。
然而，在一场大型扑克游戏中，不只是50000人在来回交换硬币。
现在每天有5000万人。
这在大计划中是什么？
没有什么

@moonboi24 well... when it goes to abuse, there it is.
One cannot control what happens to them, but one certainly has control over how one reacts.

@月亮好吧。。。当它被滥用时，它就在那里。
一个人无法控制发生在他们身上的事情，但他肯定可以控制自己的反应。

@moonboi24 And it's 2022... that sex worker comment is atrocious if not actually racist.

@月亮24号，现在是2022年。。。性工作者的评论如果不是种族主义的话，那也是残暴的。

@moonboi24 IconicExpert?
Ryan Kennedy?
I mean... we had them and they were very successful.
They were actually thieves and abusers.
Tbqh, that's why I paid attention.

@月球专家？
瑞安·肯尼迪？
我是说。。。我们有他们，他们非常成功。
他们实际上是小偷和虐待者。
Tbqh，这就是我关注的原因。

@moonboi24 See my last reply.

@请看我最后的答复。

@moonboi24 I'll defend it on logical grounds.
The threats made are not appropriate under any circumstances and missing context would not make them any more appropriate.

@我会从逻辑上为它辩护。
所作的威胁在任何情况下都是不适当的，失去背景也不会使其更加适当。

@moonboi24 If you feel defensive as a result, maybe I'm right eh?

@如果你因此感到防御，也许我是对的，嗯？

@moonboi24 No, I'm simply pointing out you brought up past convictions where are totally non-sequitur in order to call into question the statement made.
Sort of a unique type of bias.

@不，我只是简单地指出，你提出的过去的定罪完全不符合逻辑，是为了质疑你的陈述。
这是一种独特的偏见。

@moonboi24 And how did you describe him to me if not using past totally unrelated crimes (except perhaps in the case of abuse) in order to remove credibility from the individual?
Public shaming isn't a call for someone to cease a behavior, generally speaking, as you said.
For consumers

@如果他没有使用过去完全无关的罪行（也许在虐待的情况下除外）来消除个人的可信度，你是如何向我描述他的？
正如你所说，一般来说，公开羞辱并不是要求某人停止某种行为。
面向消费者

@moonboi24 That you even attempted to kill the messenger without attempting to refute a single assertion sorta leads me to think you got a vested interest here which is EXACTLY what I said happens.

@moonboi24你甚至试图杀死信使而没有试图反驳一个断言，这让我觉得你在这里有既得利益，这正是我所说的。