UNO 的最新消息

RT: The LA Sheriff is targeting his opponents and those charged to investigate him, protecting gangs who operate within his department, and destroying evidence of those who committed murders. No one should be silent about this.

RT:洛杉矶警长的目标是他的对手和那些被指控调查他的人,保护在他的部门内活动的团伙,并销毁那些犯下谋杀罪的人的证据。没有人应该对此保持沉默。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

XRP once upon a time was just a corporate created cryptocurrency intended to serve statist empowered entities.
Now it’s QAnon for crypto bros.

曾几何时,XRP 只是一种公司创建的加密货币,旨在服务于统计授权的实体。
现在是加密兄弟的 QAnon。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

XRP fanbois need to fuck off.
Your minds are like play dough.
You have no basis in reality.
Do not talk to people like me.
We will only disappoint you with demonstrable facts and air tight logic.

XRP fanbois 需要滚蛋。
你的头脑就像橡皮泥。
你在现实中没有根据。
不要和我这样的人说话。
我们只会用可证明的事实和严密的逻辑让您失望。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

See, we can agree on something. https://twitter.com/cryptocoun...

I've spent more than 30 minutes of my life engaging with you on Twitter... given that i did this, while also knowing the return would be net negative on my end... yes, I suppose I may be "mentally challenged" https://twitter.com/BryceWeine...

发表时间:1年前 作者:CRYPTO_counselor @CRYPTOcounselo2

看,我们可以就某事达成一致。 https://twitter.com/cryptocoun...

我已经在 Twitter 上与你互动了 30 多分钟……鉴于我这样做了,同时也知道回报对我来说是净负的……是的,我想我可能会“精神受到挑战” " https://twitter.com/BryceWeine...

发表时间:1年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@CRYPTOcounselo2 No. Just idiots that don’t understand the subject matter.

@CRYPTOcounselo2 不。只是不了解主题的白痴。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@CRYPTOcounselo2 Are you mentally challenged?
It's very clear.
Rewriting law is a nightmare of political footballs.
Bye, Felicia.

@CRYPTOcounselo2 你有精神问题吗?
很清楚。
改写法律是一场政治足球的噩梦。
再见,费利西亚。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@CRYPTOcounselo2 However... I did explain it.
https://twitter.com/BryceWeine...

@CRYPTOcounselo2 There's no FINRA series exam for crypto because crypto is the only asset in the entire human experience that doesn't require a clearinghouse for settlement.
The laws as they define the trading process must be rewritten just for crypto. Nobody wants that Pandora's Box.

发表时间:1年前 作者:Bryce "Cryptocurrencyologist" Weiner @BryceWeiner
发表时间:1年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@CRYPTOcounselo2 No, you want to support your argument but your argument is bullshit and you clearly have no understanding of how finance works, much less the laws that govern its operation.
Bored now.

@CRYPTOcounselo2 不,您想支持您的论点,但您的论点是胡说八道,您显然不了解金融的运作方式,更不用说管理其运作的法律了。
现在无聊。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@CRYPTOcounselo2 There's no FINRA series exam for crypto because crypto is the only asset in the entire human experience that doesn't require a clearinghouse for settlement.
The laws as they define the trading process must be rewritten just for crypto. Nobody wants that Pandora's Box.

@CRYPTOcounselo2 没有针对加密的 FINRA 系列考试,因为加密是整个人类体验中唯一不需要票据交换所进行结算的资产。
定义交易过程的法律必须仅针对加密进行重写。没有人想要那个潘多拉魔盒。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@CRYPTOcounselo2 Are you - a lawyer - asking me to explain the difference between a legal precedent and a law?
And you passed the bar?

@CRYPTOcounselo2 你是一名律师,要求我解释法律先例和法律之间的区别吗?
你通过了酒吧?

发表时间:1年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

Who gives a fuck what they say?
Nerds who don't understand how American civics works.
I'm sure those two commissioners will get nice gigs at crypto lobbyists after their tenure at the SEC for their kind words. https://twitter.com/CRYPTOcoun...

Also, 2 of the current commissioners would disagree with you, but based on the credentials you boasted about below... I suppose I should trust your take on it.
Wait, you started with "it's very clear", is this Gary's alt account? https://twitter.com/BryceWeine...

发表时间:1年前 作者:CRYPTO_counselor @CRYPTOcounselo2

谁在乎他们说什么?
不了解美国公民制度如何运作的书呆子。
我相信这两位专员在 SEC 任职后会因为他们的客气话而在加密货币游说者那里得到很好的表现。 https://twitter.com/CRYPTOcoun...

另外,两位现任委员不同意你的观点,但根据你在下面吹嘘的资历……我想我应该相信你的看法。
等等,你从“很清楚”开始,这是 Gary 的 alt 帐户吗? https://twitter.com/BryceWeine...

发表时间:1年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@CRYPTOcounselo2 I said nothing of the sort. The SEC doesn’t have the power to rewrite the laws. Congress does. You’re barking up the wrong tree.
Go cry to Congress. Oh …wait… they don’t care. Oh well.

@CRYPTOcounselo2 我什么也没说。 SEC 无权改写法律。国会有。你在叫错树。
去国会哭吧。哦……等等……他们不在乎。那好吧。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@CRYPTOcounselo2 Creating cryptocurrencies simply isn’t for everyone. Math is hard, and so is financial law.

@CRYPTOcounselo2 创建加密货币并不适合所有人。数学难,金融法也难。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@CRYPTOcounselo2 It’s very clear. I am not a lawyer - shit I have no college degree at all - I understand it perfectly.
The SEC is under no obligation to ELI5 80+ years of legal precedent for a bunch of tech dorks with a new toy. That’s life.

@CRYPTOcounselo2 很清楚。我不是律师——妈的,我根本没有大学学位——我完全理解。
SEC 没有义务遵守 ELI5 80 年来为一群拥有新玩具的技术呆子的法律先例。这就是生活。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@CRYPTOcounselo2 I've created hundreds of cryptocurrencies and they are all commodities. I have no idea what you're talking about.

@CRYPTOcounselo2 我创造了数百种加密货币,它们都是商品。我不知道你在说什么。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@CRYPTOcounselo2 I was talking about ETH.
Utility tokens don’t exist. Chuck E Cheese tokens before you build the arcade are a security.

@CRYPTOcounselo2 我说的是 ETH。
实用代币不存在。建立街机之前的 Chuck E Cheese 代币是一种证券。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@CRYPTOcounselo2 Do you have a matter of law to discuss specifically or just conspiracy theory?

@CRYPTOcounselo2 你有法律问题要专门讨论还是只讨论阴谋论?

发表时间:1年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@CRYPTOcounselo2 What Genesis block?
What entity issued tokens and sold them to fund it?
None and none.
Long way to go to prove 3rd party here. Please feel free to try and not sound like an XRP conspiracy theorist.

@CRYPTOcounselo2 什么创世区块?
哪个实体发行代币并出售代币为其提供资金?
没有也没有。
在这里证明第三者还有很长的路要走。请随意尝试,不要听起来像 XRP 阴谋论者。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@tabali_tigi

@tabali_tigi

发表时间:1年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

Now Playing: Fantastic Four (2015)
If the CW made Marvel movies.
And…um… at 1 hour and 22 minutes we watch a passenger plane get destroyed and not only do our heroes do nothing to save it, they don’t even mention it to say “damn, should we have done something?”
Cretins.

正在播放:神奇四侠 (2015)
如果 CW 制作漫威电影。
而且……嗯……在 1 小时 22 分钟时,我们看到一架客机被摧毁,我们的英雄们不仅没有采取任何行动来拯救它,他们甚至没有提到它说“该死,我们应该做点什么吗?”
白痴。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情