@slowhandzen Too soon to cut out Fast and the Furious but your point is well taken. I'd also add you can't cut out the Star Wars franchise either, but then same parent company....

@slowhandzen太快了，无法快速切入，而且非常愤怒，但你的观点被很好地理解了。我还想补充一点，你也不能退出《星球大战》系列，但同样的母公司。。。。

@slowhandzen And the integration of the Sonyverse makes any bullshittery totally plausible.
"Oh this is an alternate universe shut up nerd."

@slowhandzen和Sonyverse的结合使得任何胡说八道都完全可信。
“哦，这是另一个宇宙闭嘴书呆子。”

@slowhandzen I almost wonder (worry?) that die hard fans like us are gonna be told to go pound sand and the MCU creates its own canon.

@我几乎想知道（担心？）像我们这样的铁杆粉丝会被告知去捣碎沙子，MCU会创造自己的佳能。

Beyond explaining how Fury and Coulson bonded and how Fury ended up w/ only one eye, Nick Fury had greater character development as a supporting character than Carol Danvers did as the lead.
https://twitter.com/Beam_Scott...

除了解释《怒火》和库尔森是如何结合在一起的，以及《怒火》是如何以一只眼睛收场的之外，尼克·弗瑞作为配角的性格发展比卡罗尔·丹弗斯作为主角的性格发展更大。
https://twitter.com/Beam_Scott...

@slowhandzen Time travel is as lazy a gimmick as dream sequences.
They also didn't answer if more than one soul stone could exist at a time because it sorta seemed like if you paid the price you'd just get one. Seemingly no limits on if it was already out there or not.

@slowhandzen时间旅行就像梦境一样是一种偷懒的噱头。
他们也没有回答一次是否可以存在多个灵魂石，因为似乎如果你付出代价，你只会得到一个。似乎没有限制它是否已经存在。

@slowhandzen Going back in time to get an object that would allow you to control time but obtain it before the current owner: okay.
Not then using that object to get everything else you needed simply to create drama: unacceptable.
The number of Pym particles or making mistakes didn't matter

@slowhandzen回到过去，得到一个可以让你控制时间的物体，但是在当前所有者之前得到它：好的。
而不是仅仅用这个物体来获得你所需要的一切来创造戏剧：不可接受。
Pym粒子的数量或犯错误并不重要

@tabali_tigi 10000%
She needs kryptonite and it's almost offensive to me to think that Marvel Studios writers didn't notice they created a character with no weakness which is a cardinal sin, frankly.

@tabali_tigi 10000%
她需要氪石，我觉得漫威工作室的编剧们没有注意到他们创造了一个没有弱点的角色，这几乎是冒犯，坦白说，这是一个大罪。

@slowhandzen More weirdness. Scarlet Witch or Black Widow would have fit in their perfectly, and frankly the Maximoff's character could *clearly* beat Thanos which only leads one to more questions.

@懒散和更古怪。鲜红的女巫或黑寡妇会完美地融入他们的角色，坦率地说，马克西莫夫的角色可以*明显地*击败塔诺斯，这只会导致一个以上的问题。

@slowhandzen Same, but Black Widow is a deep background movie and not specifically a setup for future events. It explains more as to why the characters are who they are and why their legacy matters. Boring at points, but not complete chaos.

@slowhandzen也一样，但《黑寡妇》是一部背景很深的电影，并不是专门为未来事件而设的。它更多地解释了为什么角色是他们自己，为什么他们的遗产很重要。有些地方很无聊，但不是完全混乱。

@slowhandzen Understanding however that the Marvel universe is literally filled w/ actual gods and doing so was totally unnecessary even for the positive messaging.
I have no idea why they did that.

@然而，斯洛文岑明白，漫威的宇宙实际上充满了真实的神，这样做是完全没有必要的，即使是为了传达积极的信息。
我不知道他们为什么那样做。

The only purpose for that movie was clearly to wedge it between the installments of Infinity War to explain how they decided Thanos was going to lose.
It's not even on the same level as almost every other film in Phases 1-4
https://twitter.com/slowhandze...

这部电影的唯一目的显然是在《无限战争》的两个部分之间插入，以解释他们如何决定塔诺斯会输。
它甚至不在第1-4阶段几乎所有其他电影的水平上
https://twitter.com/slowhandze...

The MCU version of Carol Danvers is literally the MOST BORING SUPERHERO EVER as she has absolutely NO redemption arc @tabali_tigi can I get an amen

MCU版的卡罗尔·丹弗斯（Carol Danvers）是有史以来最无聊的超级英雄，因为她绝对没有救赎之道@tabali_tigi我能得到阿门吗

Not liking Captain Marvel means you have a talent for, if not proper training and understanding of, film appreciation.
Captain Marvel was a terrible movie in half a dozen ways and the arc of the main character does not fix nor excuse any of them. https://twitter.com/BudrykZack...

不喜欢漫威船长意味着你在电影欣赏方面有天赋，即使不是适当的培训和理解。
《漫威船长》在六个方面都是一部糟糕的电影，主角的弧线并不能纠正或原谅任何一个方面。https://twitter.com/BudrykZack...

@statsfolio One month ago a widespread European land war did not seem likely.
Today... it looks almost inevitable.

@一个月前，欧洲似乎不太可能爆发大规模的陆地战争。
今天这看起来几乎是不可避免的。

Nickel futures are having a moment.
h/t @statsfolio https://t.co/lc5mnjMApF

镍期货正在经历一段时间。
h/t@Statfoliohttps://t.co/lc5mnjMApF

@statsfolio For commodities always look at the futures, too.
If spot and futures top out at the same time ... that's consumption and not idle speculation.

@大宗商品的投资组合也总是着眼于未来。
如果现货和期货同时上涨。。。这是消费，而不是无谓的投机。

@statsfolio And without a conflict-based analysis you'd be scratching your head.
This looks like stockpiling for an uncertain future if anything does.

@如果没有基于冲突的分析，你会抓狂的。
这看起来像是为了一个不确定的未来而囤积，如果有什么效果的话。

RT: @BryceWeiner hey Bryce ! .. Nickel just gapped .. check this shit out. https://t.co/ZGYL4ofioz

转发：@Brycewiner嘿Bryce。。镍只是裂开了。。看看这个。https://t.co/ZGYL4ofioz

@statsfolio Watch cadmium and zinc, too. Same reasons.

@Statfolio也会关注镉和锌。同样的原因。

Nickel and Lithium are used in rechargeable batteries.
A new technology now ubiquitous on the modern battlefield.
https://twitter.com/statsfolio...

镍和锂用于可充电电池。
现代战场上无处不在的新技术。
https://twitter.com/statsfolio...