@EKBK12 Oh I really wanna hear how you think that's even remotely accurate.
Please, explain how you arrive at such a statement.

@EKBK12哦，我真的很想听听你怎么认为这一点是准确的。
请解释一下你是如何得出这样的结论的。

BRICS banks already showing signs of adherence to international law over loyalty to founding member states.
https://economictimes.indiatim...

金砖四国的银行已经显示出遵守国际法、忠于创始成员国的迹象。
https://economictimes.indiatim...

The Smollett verdict means nothing in the grand scheme of things and I really have no thoughts on it either way except that if the verdict pisses off authoritarians this badly justice was probably served.

斯莫列特的判决在大计划中毫无意义，我真的没有任何想法，除了如果判决激怒了威权主义者，那么正义可能得到了很好的伸张。

@JCDeFi23552 I wish you could see that it is a function of my experiences that I know such policies are not solutions to the problems of cross-border crime like human trafficking.
What one should ask is why it is seen as an acceptable course of action for some, at all?

@JCDeFi23552我希望你们能看到，由于我的经历，我知道这些政策并不能解决人口贩运等跨境犯罪问题。
我们应该问的是，为什么它被视为一些人可以接受的行动方针？

@JCDeFi23552 One exception is all it takes and a theory must be re-evaluated.
If there's me, there's more.

@JCDeFi23552只有一个例外，必须重新评估一个理论。
如果有我，还有更多。

@JCDeFi23552 That's not for you to decide, but it does make you wrong.
It gives me a great deal of satisfaction to have conversations like this one.
Mostly at the hypocrisies required as if somehow I could accomplish something like that but then I'm wrong about what made it happen.

@JCDeFi23552这不是你的决定，但它确实让你错了。
有这样的对话让我非常满意。
主要是虚伪，好像我能以某种方式完成这样的事情，但我错了，是什么让它发生的。

@JCDeFi23552 That says more about you than it does about me and I'm totally okay with that.

@JCDef23552说的更多的是关于你，而不是关于我，我完全同意。

@JCDeFi23552 What if I could do things that 99% of people in the world can't do?
The kinds of things that make up action movie franchises.
The difference being it wasn't a movie.
If you're wrong about my contributions to the world, what else are you wrong about? 🤔
https://twitter.com/BryceWeine...

@JCDeFi23552如果我能做世界上99%的人做不到的事情呢？
构成动作片系列的东西。
区别在于这不是一部电影。
如果你错了我对世界的贡献，你还有什么错？🤔
https://twitter.com/BryceWeine...

@murnut Oh it's totally just political positioning but lo and behold those jets are gonna move.

@默努特：哦，这完全只是政治定位，但你瞧，那些飞机会移动的。

@JCDeFi23552 I suppose that's a matter of perspective.
Buuuut that's also demonstrably false.
Lots of people know why, tho it's totally understandable if you don't.
Some people even think I'm a hero for my past deeds.
You might, too. 😉

@JCDeFi23552我想这是一个视角问题。
Buuut这也明显是错误的。
很多人都知道为什么，但如果你不知道，这是完全可以理解的。
有些人甚至认为我是过去行为的英雄。
你也可以。😉

RT: NEW: Twitter has removed content from Russian Embassy UK claiming the bombing of a maternity hospital had been staged https://t.co/dV3TvduDj4

RT：最新消息：Twitter已经删除了俄罗斯驻英国大使馆的内容，称一家妇产医院被炸毁https://t.co/dV3TvduDj4

@murnut Did you see this?
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/0...

@穆纳特你看到了吗？
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/0...

@JCDeFi23552 I love how Twitter shitposters like to bring that up as if I don't wear balaclavas and create righteous mayhem.
That demonstrable reality is a real problem for some folks.

@JCDeFi23552我喜欢推特上的混蛋们这样说，就好像我不戴巴拉克拉瓦帽，制造正义的混乱。
对一些人来说，这种显而易见的现实是一个真正的问题。

@murnut Yeah, but because of where we have them placed.
Namely being Turkey.
We could make Donbass glow in the dark in less time than it would take DoorDash to deliver your dinner.

@穆纳特：是的，但是因为我们把它们放在哪里。
就是土耳其。
我们可以让唐巴斯在黑暗中发光，比DoorDash送晚餐所需的时间要短。

@JCDeFi23552 You cannot honestly believe that. It defies both logic and the facts presented demonstrable reality. Really close to that definition of psychosis. Tread lightly.

@你不能诚实地相信这一点。它既违背了逻辑，也违背了事实证明的现实。非常接近精神病的定义。轻踩。

@murnut Without a conventional military to back it up you're just an annoyance like DPRK, not a superpower.

@穆尔努特没有常规军队的支持，你只是一个讨厌的朝鲜，而不是一个超级大国。

What is BRICS if Russia is a military paper tiger with an internationally and nearly universally sanctioned economy?
Venezuela jumping ship may be a sign of things to come.

如果俄罗斯是一只军事纸老虎，拥有国际上几乎普遍认可的经济，那么金砖国家会是什么？
委内瑞拉跳船可能是未来的一个迹象。

@JCDeFi23552 Not sure how you can say that but I can certainly say that supporting the nearly universally recognized super villain is not a formula for winning elections.

@JCDeFi23552不知道你怎么能这么说，但我可以肯定地说，支持这个几乎被普遍认可的超级恶棍并不是赢得选举的一个公式。

I'm the guy that said Putin's logic for the invasion was valid, however I never once said that it was ethical or moral to do so.
Being logically correct and ethically and morally bankrupt is totally possible.
Win or lose, Putin's govt should collapse in the next 18 months.

我说普京入侵的逻辑是正确的，但我从未说过这样做是合乎道德的。
逻辑正确、道德败坏是完全可能的。
无论输赢，普京政府都应该在未来18个月内垮台。

Meanwhile, if you're a farmer you're looking at planting wheat for the next few seasons and making an absolute killing.
US farmers are the winners in the Ukraine conflict so far.
https://twitter.com/JCDeFi2355... https://t.co/ktDhCc9Hn8

同时，如果你是一个农民，你会在接下来的几个季节里种植小麦，并获得绝对的利润。
到目前为止，美国农民是乌克兰冲突的赢家。
https://twitter.com/JCDeFi2355... https://t.co/ktDhCc9Hn8