Thank you for the correction.
It's a prospective country, but that doesn't change a thing it actually adds to it.
Adding Ukraine to NATO would be problematic.
Resources + Strategy
https://twitter.com/zwartekip/...
@BryceWeiner Ukraine is a prospect NATO member. They are still not a full member.
发表时间：4年前 作者：zwartekip @zwartekip谢谢你的更正。
它是一个有前途的国家，但这并没有改变它实际上增加了什么。
将乌克兰加入北约将是个问题。
资源+战略
https://twitter.com/zwartekip/...
@布莱斯韦纳乌克兰是北约的潜在成员国。他们还不是正式成员。
@zwartekip Fair enough but that just adds to it as to demonstrate that adding Ukraine would be troublesome.
@兹瓦特基普说得很公平，但这只是增加了一点，表明加入乌克兰会很麻烦。
Follow the money.
https://youtu.be/PBwAxmrE194
跟着钱走。
https://youtu.be/PBwAxmrE194
This is a map of the gas transmission system in the Ukraine.
The far right of the image shows the pipelines to Russia... in the Donbas region.
The "conflict" is Putin seizing territory to protect Russia's supply of natural resources.
Ukraine is a NATO country. Makes sense. https://t.co/c4BRdex2DJ
这是乌克兰天然气输送系统的地图。
图片最右边显示了通往俄罗斯的管道。。。在顿巴斯地区。
“冲突”是普京夺取领土以保护俄罗斯的自然资源供应。
乌克兰是北约国家。有道理。https://t.co/c4BRdex2DJ
The Donbas region has only one thing in it: coal.
Where there is coal, there is natural gas.
We're getting closer to WTF is going on. https://t.co/doC61nNJye
顿巴斯地区只有一种东西：煤炭。
哪里有煤，哪里就有天然气。
我们越来越接近世界跆拳道联合会。https://t.co/doC61nNJye
Futures still flat.
https://twitter.com/yarotrof/s...
Putin instructs defense ministry to deploy Russian “peacekeeping” troops to Donbas. https://t.co/skV6IqiK1p
发表时间：4年前 作者：Yaroslav Trofimov @yarotrof未来仍然是平坦的。
https://twitter.com/yarotrof/s...
普京指示国防部向顿巴斯部署俄罗斯“维和”部队。https://t.co/skV6IqiK1p
Butt dialed by DoorDash.
The future is weird.
用门板拨屁股。
未来很奇怪。
RT: How many smart contract exploits were proved to be definitively executed by someone not involved in the project?
Asking for a friend.
RT：有多少智能合约漏洞被证明是由未参与该项目的人最终执行的？
找个朋友。
Unless I am mistaken OpenSea can halt trading.
They did not.
除非我错了，OpenSea可以停止交易。
他们没有。
With tornado on both ends the attacker left nothing but footprints.
In crypto crime does pay.
龙卷风的两端袭击者只留下了脚印。
在加密犯罪中是值得的。
RT: @BryceWeiner Omg the poll results, we are not early, the idiots are all here already.
转发：@Brycewiner天哪，民意调查结果出来了，我们还不早，白痴们都已经来了。
The phishing component was in two parts: an introduction which explained why they would receive the malicious email in the future and the malicious email.
The emails themselves were perfect.
The attacker account was funded last month.
Much malice aforethought.
网络钓鱼部分分为两部分：一部分是介绍，解释了他们将来为什么会收到恶意电子邮件，另一部分是恶意电子邮件。
邮件本身就很完美。
攻击者的账户上个月获得了资金。
预谋了很多恶意。
RT: @BryceWeiner Definitely none of them, nothing to see here, move along
转发：@Brycewiner绝对没有，这里没什么可看的，快走
Requisite knowledge required for OpenSea hack:
* Solidity
* Wyvern
* OpenSea source code
* How OpenSea implemented Wyvern
* OpenSea user community (to execute phishing necessary)
That’s extremely rarified. How many people on the entire planet have that knowledge set? 25? 6?
OpenSea黑客所需的必要知识：
*坚固性
*威文
*OpenSea源代码
*OpenSea如何实现Wyvern
*OpenSea用户社区（必要时执行钓鱼）
这是非常罕见的。全世界有多少人拥有这种知识？25? 6.
That one time when the DAO hack was traced back to one of the people investigating it.
有一次，当DAO黑客被追踪到调查它的一个人时。
How many smart contract exploits were proved to be definitively executed by someone not involved in the project?
Asking for a friend.
有多少智能合约漏洞被证明是由未参与该项目的人最终执行的？
找个朋友。