Consider that for maximalism to succeed the US constitution must be changed.
The US government is as obligated to print money as it is to hold elections for President or appoint a Supreme Court.
Unless that is changed, maximalism will NEVER happen.
考虑到为了实现最大化，美国宪法必须改变。
美国政府有义务印钞票，就像它有义务举行总统选举或任命最高法院一样。
除非改变这一点，否则最大化永远不会发生。
One chain to rule them all is a fantasy.
It will never happen.
It's just too easy to make new ones and there's no reason why we cannot.
An attempt to stop it - like making new crypto illegal - would be an outright declaration of war and perhaps the dumbest idea evar.
一条链条来统治他们是一种幻想。
这永远不会发生。
制造新产品太容易了，我们没有理由不能。
试图阻止它——就像让新密码非法化一样——将是一场彻头彻尾的战争，也许是最愚蠢的想法。
Odd tie in to this thread from the "everyone is dead" thread.
https://twitter.com/cryptohobb...
@BryceWeiner Hence why blockchain and crypto are becoming so prevalent because we are all collectively & unconsciously participating in consensus mechanisms until we get to the one chain that rules them all.
发表时间：4年前 作者：Hobbs @cryptohobbs从“每个人都死了”这条线中奇怪地连接到这条线。
https://twitter.com/cryptohobb...
@因此，区块链和加密技术之所以如此流行，是因为我们都是；无意识地参与共识机制，直到我们找到一条支配它们的链条。
Inflation got you down?
Here's the cost of 1 gallon of sunflower oil in a German grocery store as of 3 days ago. https://t.co/Qee1PB5U8D
通货膨胀让你沮丧？
这是三天前德国一家杂货店1加仑葵花籽油的价格。https://t.co/Qee1PB5U8D
What I feel is far more interesting, if not esoteric, is that the consensus model which works best eventually follows use case and that may change over time.
That's pretty astounding if not in direct contradiction to a good deal of crypto dogma.
我觉得更有趣（如果不是深奥的话）的是，最有效的共识模型最终会遵循用例，并且随着时间的推移可能会发生变化。
这是相当令人震惊的，如果不是直接与大量加密教条相矛盾的话。
All of this navel gazing over ETH2 is really just mental masturbation because, in the end, the TVL of DeFi clockworks made it inevitable for long term risk off.
And that's just not a problem Bitcoin has.
所有这些盯着ETH2看肚脐的行为实际上只是精神上的自慰，因为最终，DeFi clockworks的TVL让长期风险规避成为不可避免。
这并不是比特币的问题。
It's just a sign of the times where folks shitpost other networks based on information that is 6 years out of date.
... even more so that folks just eat it up without knowing it.
这只是一个时代的标志，人们根据6年前过时的信息发布其他网络。
... 更重要的是，人们在不知不觉中就把它吃掉了。
I think there's a valid analogy to be made between abolishing the filibuster and why UASF exists.
我认为在废除阻挠议事程序和UASF存在的原因之间有一个合理的类比。
Prior to UASF miners dictated the protocol each and every block.
After UASF the means of protocol consensus became distinctly more opaque.
Developers just got tired of trying to sell miners on new - if not questionable - ideas.
UASF short circuited that process.
在UASF之前，矿工们对每个区块都口述了协议。
在UASF之后，协议共识的手段变得明显更加不透明。
开发商已经厌倦了向矿商兜售新的——如果没有问题的话——创意。
UASF缩短了这一过程。
It's so powerful of an addition to the network that theoretically UASF can increase the 21M limit of tokens to be emitted.
In a valid perspective, UASF was itself an "attack" on the network.
它是如此强大的网络附加功能，理论上UASF可以增加2100万个令牌的发射限制。
从合理的角度来看，UASF本身就是对网络的“攻击”。
UASF fundamentally altered the dynamics of BTC governance to the point where anything may be activated if there's popular support.
Manufacturing such support... is a much longer thread.
UASF从根本上改变了BTC治理的动态，如果有大众支持，任何东西都可能被激活。
制造这样的支持。。。是一根更长的线。
Ignoring what one might consider the arbitrary context of an "attack", the ability to take over the BTC blockchain via "hostile" mining hasn't been a factor since UASF went online.
It's not even worth considering, as are many other potential "attack" vectors. https://twitter.com/stonecoldp...
In the coming years, it will become obvious what is the final line of defence against a 51% attack:
- In Bitcoin, the ability to manufacture the hardware
- In Ethereum, the capital cost to acquire the stake.
Assuming a 51% attack does occur, the only way to retaliate:
忽略了人们可能会考虑的“攻击”的任意上下文，从UASF上线以来，通过“敌对”挖掘接管BTC封锁链的能力并不是一个因素。
它甚至不值得考虑，就像许多其他潜在的“攻击”载体一样。https://twitter.com/stonecoldp...
在未来几年里，对抗51%攻击的最后防线将变得显而易见：
-在比特币中，制造硬件的能力
-在以太坊，收购股份的资本成本。
假设发生了51%的攻击，唯一的报复方式是：
An "attack" is any behavior that current asset holders do not like, regardless of the actual outcome.
“攻击”是指当前资产持有者不喜欢的任何行为，无论实际结果如何。
“Crypto deal ninja” https://t.co/ceiI4Splcj
“加密交易忍者”https://t.co/ceiI4Splcj
@ElConnekto Buddhism would seem to say that it doesn't matter, and the most one might say is that in these last moments we have been given a chance to be our best selves before it all blinks out like a light.
@ElConnekto佛教似乎会说，这无关紧要，人们可能会说，在这最后的时刻，我们有机会成为最好的自己，在它像一盏灯一样闪烁之前。
The universe isn’t a hologram.
Everyone is dead. https://t.co/U8M0FMcxcv
宇宙不是全息图。
所有人都死了。https://t.co/U8M0FMcxcv
RT: I've Hidden a ETH private key in Central Park New York City buried in a small Tupperware container. It contains a milady. Go. https://t.co/ZablvclLWs
RT：我把一把ETH私钥藏在纽约中央公园的一个小特百惠容器里。里面有一位女士。去https://t.co/ZablvclLWs
Back to the OP, Miner GPUs are not top of the line for gaming applications these days.
Used cards are not gonna be worth a damn on resale.
They are just gonna be junk.
回到OP，现在Miner GPU并不是游戏应用的首选。
二手卡在转售时一文不值。
它们只会是垃圾。
This wall of physics will do more to drive QC development than anything else as humanity struggles to process more and more data.
随着人类努力处理越来越多的数据，这堵物理墙将比其他任何东西更能推动QC的发展。