Unobtanium 的最新消息

@mgtxrp @TimR614 @HODLmaxi @TheXRPness @a16z What rage?
I’m sorry but at no point have I ever been angry or even anything beyond amused.
Y’all are divorced from reality to the point of gaslighting.

@mgtxrp@TimR614@HODLmaxi@TheXRPness@a16z什么愤怒?
我很抱歉,但我从来没有生气过,甚至从来没有觉得有趣过。
你们都离现实太远了。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@QuantNetworkDev The fact that you can read the emails shows how diligent they are. It also shows that Hinman constantly challenges ethical boundaries.
Both can be true at the same time. What is wrong with you people?

@QuantNetworkDev你可以阅读这些电子邮件,这表明它们是多么勤奋。它还表明,欣曼不断挑战道德界限。
两者可以同时成立。你们这些人怎么了?

发表时间:4年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@mgtxrp @TimR614 @HODLmaxi @TheXRPness @a16z I’m not angry. I don’t own any of the tokens in question. This is purely academic for me.
I think you’re projecting.

@mgtxrp@TimR614@HODLmaxi@TheXRPness@a16z我不生气。我没有任何有问题的代币。这对我来说纯粹是学术性的。
我觉得你在投射。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@NVXRP1 @HODLmaxi @TheXRPness @a16z That’s not what that is. That’s soft power not legal jurisdiction.
Excellent try tho. Seriously. That confuses the shit out of people and it is designed to do so.

@NVXRP1@HODLmaxi@TheXRPness@a16z不是这样的。这是软实力,不是法律管辖权。
很好,试试看。认真地这会把人们的大便弄糊涂,而且它的设计初衷就是这样。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@HODLmaxi @TheXRPness @a16z Mine. EOS was almost in the clear except they advertised on Times Square. Hashgraph. Solana. Hoskins’ project. Lots of folks have done it.
Ripple is an exception. The only thing all those projects have in common is the sales ended. The XRP sale never ends.

@HODLmaxi@TheXRPness@a16z矿。除了在时代广场上做广告外,EOS几乎没有任何问题。哈希图。索拉纳。霍斯金斯的项目。很多人都做过。
Ripple是个例外。所有这些项目唯一的共同点是销售结束。XRP的销售永远不会结束。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@SifuCrypto And mind you this has changed while these politicians have been in office and passed the last gun laws.

@SifuCrypto,请注意,在这些政客执政并通过最后的枪支法期间,情况发生了变化。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@SifuCrypto Without the brass, lead, copper, and gunpowder a gun is just a lump of metal.
You can’t DIY primers for modern weapon tolerances. You can’t mold your own brass to tolerances.
Things have changed. Ammunition should be the focus. That leaves enthusiasts with black powder.

@SifuCrypto没有黄铜、铅、铜和火药,枪只是一块金属。
你不能为现代武器设计DIY引物。你不能把自己的黄铜铸成公差。
事情变了。弹药应该是重点。这给狂热者留下了黑色粉末。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@HODLmaxi @TheXRPness @a16z You want I can recommend a mover to help you with those goalposts?

@HODLmaxi@TheXRPness@a16z你想要我推荐一位搬运工帮你解决那些门柱问题吗?

发表时间:4年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@HODLmaxi @TheXRPness @a16z SEC jurisdiction is *clearly* defined by both law and precedent.

@HODLmaxi@TheXRPness@a16z SEC的管辖权由法律和判例明确界定。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@HODLmaxi @TheXRPness @a16z False.

@HODLmaxi@TheXRPness@a16z错误。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@HODLmaxi @TheXRPness @a16z Because things can change over time. Commodity status requires constant vigilance.
You’re only making Ripple look more guilty.

@HODLmaxi@TheXRPness@a16z,因为事情会随着时间而改变。商品地位需要时刻保持警惕。
你只会让Ripple看起来更内疚。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@HODLmaxi @TheXRPness @a16z Jurisdiction isn’t regulatory clarity. That you would attempt to confuse them is either your ignorance or your dishonesty. Which is it?

@HODLmaxi@TheXRPness@a16z管辖区的监管不明确。你试图混淆他们,不是你的无知就是你的不诚实。是哪一个?

发表时间:4年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@HODLmaxi @TheXRPness @a16z You cannot explain jurisdiction therefore your narrative is lacking at the most basic level.

@HODLmaxi@TheXRPness@a16z你无法解释管辖权,因此你的叙述缺乏最基本的层面。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@HODLmaxi @TheXRPness @a16z What jurisdiction does the SEC have over ETH?

@HODLmaxi@TheXRPness@a16z SEC对ETH有什么管辖权?

发表时间:4年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@HODLmaxi @TheXRPness @a16z There absolutely was.
It was a Swiss company which solicited investment in developing a cryptocurrency which rewarded investors with tokens and once the network launched the company dissolved and all monies were spent and accounted for.
That you don’t know this speaks volumes

@HODLmaxi@TheXRPness@a16z绝对有。
这是一家瑞士公司,该公司寻求投资开发一种加密货币,以代币奖励投资者。一旦网络启动,该公司解散,所有资金都被使用并入账。
你不知道这足以说明问题

发表时间:4年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@SifuCrypto People gonna be people. This specifically targets ghost guns and the way they are going about it is wrong. You cannot know if a ghost gun exists before it kills someone. What good does regulating them do?

@SifuCrypto人会成为人的。这是专门针对幽灵枪的,他们的做法是错误的。在杀人之前,你不可能知道幽灵枪是否存在。监管它们有什么好处?

发表时间:4年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@HODLmaxi @TheXRPness @a16z You know how you’re wrong?
You cannot explain how the SEC has jurisdiction over ETH which is the requirement to apply Howey.

@HODLmaxi@TheXRPness@a16z你知道你错了吗?
你无法解释SEC如何对ETH拥有管辖权,这是应用Howey的要求。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@HODLmaxi @TheXRPness @a16z And failed.

@HODLmaxi@TheXRPness@a16z失败了。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@HODLmaxi @TheXRPness @a16z Sure. But that’s also because the legal structure used was at the time unproved.
No more, no less.

@HODLmaxi@TheXRPness@a16z当然。但这也是因为当时使用的法律结构尚未得到证实。
不多也不少。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@HODLmaxi @TheXRPness @a16z Okay. At what point in time would you like to use?

@HODLmaxi@TheXRPness@a16z好的。您希望在什么时间点使用?

发表时间:4年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情