@JacobYako2 @Blazoman1 @Dr_CSWright @jadwahab @kurtwuckertjr @nChainGlobal #BSV example sounds like it came from our patent. Read your explanation above, then this patent excerpt, then give me your "off the cuff" opinion on the possibility of infringement, then look at # of '566 patent cites by nChain (~17). Accurate enough? I don't care about BSV yet https://t.co/z2ZLiDibe4

@JacobYako2@Blazoman1@Dr\u CSWright@jadwahab@kurtwuckertjr@nChainGlobal#BSV示例听起来像来自我们的专利。阅读上面的解释，然后是这篇专利摘录，然后给我你对侵权可能性的“即兴”意见，然后看看nChain（约17）引用的566项专利。是否足够准确？我还不在乎BSVhttps://t.co/z2ZLiDibe4

@JacobYako2 @Blazoman1 @Dr_CSWright @jadwahab @kurtwuckertjr @nChainGlobal I don't mind you nitpicking at it but you're being insulting and inaccurate at the same time. That's never a good combination, is it?
Haven't bothered to look into BSV, but we've clear opinions on BCH, BCG and BTC. There's a material chance that out opinion on BSV may not differ

@JacobYako2@Blazoman1@Dr\u CSWright@jadwahab@kurtwuckertjr@nChainGlobal我不介意你吹毛求疵，但你同时也在侮辱和不准确。这从来都不是一个好的组合，是吗？
没有费心调查BSV，但我们对BCH、BCG和BTC有明确的意见。很有可能我们对BSV的意见不会有分歧

@Blazoman1 @JacobYako2 @Dr_CSWright @jadwahab @kurtwuckertjr @nChainGlobal Hey, I may not be as smart as you guys, which is why I need to pose this very basic question:
Instead of guessing and pontificating (incorrectly, may I add) as to what the patent covers, why don't you guys just read it for yourselves?

@Blazoman1@jacobyko2@Dr\u CSWright@jadwahab@kurtwuckertjr@nChainGlobal嘿，我可能没有你们这么聪明，这就是为什么我需要提出这个非常基本的问题：
与其猜测和夸夸其谈（我可以补充一下，这是错误的）专利涵盖了什么，为什么你们不自己读一下呢？

@store_optimal @warrensplace @Dr_CSWright @nChainGlobal Do you have a preconceived disposition (aka,, prejudice) as to whether Bitcoin infringes on someone else's idea, or are you actually looking to discover the truth?
Google lawsuits of infringement, research the meaning under law. If you use patented IP without consent you infringe https://t.co/gWMCVvCW8U

@store\u optimal@warrensplace@Dr\u CSWright@nChainGlobal对于比特币是否侵犯了其他人的想法，您是否有先入为主的倾向（即偏见），或者您实际上是在寻找真相？
谷歌侵权诉讼，研究法律下的含义。如果您未经同意使用专利知识产权，您将侵犯https://t.co/gWMCVvCW8U

@store_optimal @Dr_CSWright @nChainGlobal It's easy to prove. I'm actually finalizing the proof document right now as I type this. It is called a claims table. You yourself said that #Bitcoin was open source, so the evidence is available for all to see.
Don't confuse what you want to be the case with what the case is.

@store\u optimal@Dr\u CSWright@nChainGlobal很容易证明。实际上，我现在正在敲定证明文件，因为我键入了这个。它被称为索赔表。你自己说过#比特币是开源的，所以所有人都可以看到证据。
不要混淆你想要的情况和实际情况。

@store_optimal @Dr_CSWright @nChainGlobal I would also like for you to explain for the community how patents are unenforceable.
There's going to be a significant shakedown in the crypto sphere, and part of the impetus of that shakedown will come from those who aren't knowledgeable in a space making decisions in the same.

@store\u optimal@Dr\u CSWright@nChainGlobal我还想让您向社区解释专利是如何无法强制执行的。
密码学领域将有一次重大的整顿，整顿的部分动力将来自那些不熟悉密码学领域的人，他们将在同一领域做出决策。

@store_optimal @Dr_CSWright @nChainGlobal You're stating things as if you're a crypto IP authority. Are you? I did build a lot of things, very early on, & patented those things. Those patented things were then adopted by others and placed into open sourced software without my consent. Explain how this isn't how it works

@store\u optimal@Dr\u CSWright@nChainGlobal您的陈述就像您是一个加密IP授权机构。你是吗？我很早就做了很多事情；为这些东西申请专利。这些获得专利的东西随后被其他人采用，并在未经我同意的情况下被放入开源软件中。解释这不是怎么回事

@mochanerd @Dr_CSWright @nChainGlobal Again, I never said I was going to sue anyone. That said, assuming #Bitcoin infringes our patented IP, can you not think of any businesses using BTC, ex. exchanges, cold storage, payments, etc.?
I think there's a large swath of companies that use bitcoin for core infrastructure!

@mochanerd@Dr\u CSWright@nChainGlobal我再也没说过要起诉任何人了。也就是说，假设#比特币侵犯了我们的专利知识产权，你能想象不出有任何企业使用BTC、交易所、冷库、支付等吗。？
我认为有很多公司使用比特币作为核心基础设施！

@Monika_Kompara @Dr_CSWright @nChainGlobal The transfer of value, conditioned upon some data, optionally without counterparty or credit risk. https://t.co/vxewJPxwud

@Monika\u Kompara@Dr\u CSWright@nChainGlobal价值转移，以某些数据为条件，可选择无交易对手或信用风险。https://t.co/vxewJPxwud

@Monika_Kompara @Dr_CSWright @nChainGlobal I'm not a patent attorney, thus am just as much a layperson as the next. From the layperson's perspective, simply look at the physical front cover of the US patent, which I believe explains it all. Start with the assumption that #Bitcoin is a product that infringes the patent... https://t.co/qsdx0gdUcH

@Monika\u Kompara@Dr\u CSWright@nChainGlobal我不是专利律师，因此我和下一个一样是外行。从外行的角度来看，只需看看美国专利的物理封面，我相信这可以解释一切。首先假设#比特币是一种侵犯专利的产品。。。https://t.co/qsdx0gdUcH

@Monika_Kompara @Dr_CSWright @nChainGlobal I never said I would sue, but if I were to do such, the relevant question would be....
"What companies use #BTC?

@Monika\u Kompara@Dr\u CSWright@nChainGlobal我从来没有说过我会起诉，但如果我这样做，相关的问题将是。。。。
“哪些公司使用#BTC？

Craig Wright @Dr_CSWright wants competition & doesn't want @nChainGlobal to own every patent in the industry. Ok, but they cite my patent 17x, more than even the money center banks! If #BSV takes off, we'll look into it. In meantime, #BTC infringes our IP
https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxN...

Craig Wright@Dr\CSWright希望竞争；不希望@nChainGlobal拥有该行业的所有专利。好吧，但他们引用了我的17x专利，甚至比货币中心银行还多！如果BSV起飞，我们将进行调查。同时，#BTC侵犯了我们的知识产权
https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxN...

@theobald_kitty But, that is a burgeoning patent dispute.

@theobald\u kitty，但这是一场正在兴起的专利纠纷。

@nedkatomed Because, despite what the vested interests are telling you, the economy is stagnating. There's is no impetus for a velocity increase, or even to remain static.

@nedkatomed是因为，不管既得利益集团告诉你什么，经济正在停滞不前。没有动力来提高速度，甚至保持静止。

History doesn't repeat itself, but it certainly rhymes. Problem is, debasement is not history, its cold, hard current reality. The US has created nearly half of the total money supply --- in the last two years!!! This isn't new, & always ends bad
Listen ->
https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkx5... https://t.co/ZIKD43le89

历史不会重演，但它肯定是押韵的。问题是，贬低不是历史，它是冷酷无情的现实。在过去两年中，美国创造了近一半的货币供应量！！！这不是新的，amp；总是结局不好
侦听->；
https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkx5... https://t.co/ZIKD43le89

We all know that history doesn't repeat itself, but it certainly rhymes, right? Actually, it's alliterative #AF!
https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkxz... https://t.co/DeWObZyqjC

我们都知道历史不会重演，但它肯定是押韵的，对吗？实际上，它是头韵#AF！
https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkxz... https://t.co/DeWObZyqjC

@realhodlcrypto That's when you know there's something wrong. The case if the mysteriously appreciating depreciating asset.
Almost as silly as negative interest rates, Oh.... One is likely to cause the other, anyway.

@realhodlcrypto就是你知道有什么不对劲的时候。这种情况下，如果神秘的升值折旧资产。
几乎和负利率一样愚蠢，哦。。。。无论如何，一个很可能导致另一个。

Tell me, what's wrong with this picture and the conclusion? Methinks our forensic analyses should be required reading for practitioners in rhis space.
https://patentlawyermagazine.c... https://t.co/sVj7A8N2al

告诉我，这张照片和结论有什么问题？我认为我们的法医学分析应该被rhis空间的从业者要求阅读。
https://patentlawyermagazine.c... https://t.co/sVj7A8N2al

@Euros_forex @zkMarkAllen @coinbase @Veritaseuminc @FinanceChainge If I'm not mistaken, it really depends on what the patent says and when it was filed.
In addition, it's irrelevant where they're based. If they offer to or thru the US or Japan, they can infringe.

@欧元/外汇@zkMarkAllen@coinbase@veritaseumic@FinanceChainge如果我没有弄错的话，这实际上取决于专利的内容和申请时间。
此外，这与他们的基地无关。如果他们向美国或日本提供或通过美国或日本提供，他们可以侵犯。

@fredwilson told me that he doesn't believe in software patents (here as well https://avc.com/2011/06/enough...) when discussing US11196566, which is actually a cryptographic mechanisms for secure communication 0trust patent. I think much of the industry is not inline with how I see crypto https://t.co/YmtTqbO2Iw

@fredwilson告诉我他不相信软件专利（这里也是https://avc.com/2011/06/enough...)在讨论US11196566时，它实际上是一项用于安全通信的加密机制0trust专利。我认为很多行业都与我对加密的看法不一致https://t.co/YmtTqbO2Iw