@PiersRidyard @Lawrence_tko @AaveAave Once you consider the patent as actual personal property, the next step in understanding the evolution of the DLT space becomes much easier to grasp. That's how I knew @AaveAave would go closed source (as stated in the interview), @Uniswap etc. they essentially have no choice

@PiersRidyard@Lawrence\u tko@Aaveave一旦你将专利视为实际的个人财产，那么理解DLT空间演变的下一步就变得更容易掌握了。这就是为什么我知道@AaveAave将成为封闭源代码（如采访中所述）、@Uniswap等。他们基本上没有选择

@PiersRidyard @Lawrence_tko @AaveAave Reason for drawing comparisons in discussions is because most (you are very bright, but not everyone is as swift as you) people cannot or do not conceive patents as actual personal property, but they are. Comparing it to you car, your computer or your smelter helps understanding

@PiersRidyard@Lawrence\u tko@Aaveave在讨论中进行比较的原因是，大多数人（你很聪明，但不是每个人都像你一样敏捷）不能或不认为专利是真正的个人财产，但他们确实是。将其与您的汽车、计算机或冶炼厂进行比较有助于理解

@PiersRidyard @Lawrence_tko @AaveAave Not all. I was drawing the corollary between physical property & intellectual property, with the primary difference between real & personal is being fixed. If I'm not mistaken, you were attempting to (& explicitly did) say that IP is not the same as physical property. Not true

@PiersRidyard@Lawrence\u tko@Aaveave并非全部。我在画物理属性和；知识产权，主要区别在于不动产和；正在修复个人。如果我没有弄错的话，您试图（明确地）说IP与物理属性不同。不正确

@PiersRidyard @Lawrence_tko Good time for "Ok Reggie, you were right!
Physical property discussion https://youtu.be/Ilr4_qvIBfc?t...
IP as Personal property https://twitter.com/ReggieMidd...
I say #DeFi will go closed source, you say @AaveAave
is open https://youtu.be/Ilr4_qvIBfc?t...
but
https://www.coindesk.com/tech/...
Constructive banter!

@PiersRidyard@Lawrence\u tko“好吧，雷吉，你说得对！”！
物理性质讨论https://youtu.be/Ilr4_qvIBfc?t...
知识产权作为个人财产https://twitter.com/ReggieMidd...
我说#DeFi将成为封闭源代码，你说@aaveave
已打开https://youtu.be/Ilr4_qvIBfc?t...
但是
https://www.coindesk.com/tech/...
建设性玩笑！

@XRPtheorist I don't believe it affects our properties. This simply says the Fed has the rights that anyone else does, to challenge a patent. Challenging a patent is not the same as winning the challenge.

@XRTheorist我认为这不会影响我们的财产。这只是说，美联储有权像其他任何人一样质疑专利。挑战专利并不等于赢得挑战。

@Fuhrer_Musk @tether @federalreserve Yet, they've handily outperformed heavily regulated institutions, multiples of @tether size, who've folded under a fraction of the stress.
The attention should be directed to where the greater risk lies.
I'm not saying Tether represents zero risk, but are not objective at all.

@福勒·马斯克（Fuhrer\u Musk@tether@federalreserve）然而，他们的表现轻松地超过了监管严格的机构，其规模是“tether”规模的数倍，而这些机构在一小部分压力下倒闭了。
应注意风险较大的地方。
我并不是说栓系代表零风险，但根本不是客观的。

@TeamSatoshi Enough of this. I told you that you don't understand the dynamics. You don't have to agree with me, and I'm fine.with that, but we are now beating a dead horse.
We can just agree to disagree.

@TeamSatoshi够了。我告诉过你你不了解动态。你不必同意我，我很好。尽管如此，但我们现在正在击败一匹死马。
我们可以同意不同意。

@TeamSatoshi I read it, and you are still not seeing the forest for the trees. Alas, I'm done here, at least with thus topic. The truth will come to light soon enough.

@TeamSatoshi我读过了，你仍然没有看到森林中的树木。唉，我已经讲完了，至少这样的话题。真相很快就会揭晓。

@TeamSatoshi You are opining on a topic that I doubt you completely understand, but there is no reason for me to go back and forth any further. At least your being polite and professional about it, which is a plus
If/when I decide to make public how IP works within Bitcoin, you should see.

@TeamSatoshi你对一个话题的看法我怀疑你是否完全理解，但我没有理由再重复下去了。至少你对它有礼貌和专业，这是一个加分
如果/当我决定公开IP在比特币中的工作方式时，你应该看到。

I'm not favoring @tether, but it's critics are being highly discriminatory and extremely unrealistic. Picture a $70B US bank, regulated by @federalreserve being forced to liquidate, and payout in cash, $10B in just a week & a half! That would be a daisy-chained bank collapse! https://t.co/GB6BH3kS8J

我并不支持@tether，但它的批评者们是高度歧视性的，而且极不现实。想象一下，一家由@federalreserve监管的700亿美元美国银行被迫清算，并在一周内以现金支付100亿美元；一半！那将是一场菊花链式的银行倒闭！https://t.co/GB6BH3kS8J

@TeamSatoshi Problem is you consider it a fight in the first place, meaning you misconstrue the economics. Nobody is God, hence no one can foresee every potential contingency. A pure open-source project will always pale to one that offers the best possible solutions https://youtu.be/CH9_BwMae8M

@TeamSatoshi的问题是，你首先认为这是一场战斗，这意味着你误解了经济学。没有人是上帝，因此没有人能够预见每一个潜在的意外事件。一个纯粹的开源项目总是与提供最佳解决方案的项目相形见绌https://youtu.be/CH9_BwMae8M

@TeamSatoshi The fact that I've made such a claim should indicate that I've compared every improvement proposal to our work over the last 8 yes, FOR EVERY major chain. If you understood the patent, you'd realize the only way forward in terms of progress is through the patent. True invention

@TeamSatoshi我提出这样一个主张的事实应该表明，我已经将过去8年中的每一项改进建议与我们的工作进行了比较，是的，针对每一个主要连锁店。如果你了解专利，你就会意识到进步的唯一途径就是通过专利。真正的发明

@TeamSatoshi Your are guessing and assuming. Bitcoin is a global state machine (device).
I'm assuming that you don't know me, but I'm known for putting an extreme about of intellectual capital into very specific use cases. Your should assume that I've dug deeper into this than anyone else.

@TeamSatoshi你在猜测和假设。比特币是一种全局状态机（设备）。
我假设你不认识我，但我以在非常具体的用例中极端使用智力资本而闻名。你应该认为我对这件事的研究比任何人都深入。

@PiersRidyard @Lawrence_tko Okay, I will cite US code if that is better - patents r equivalent 2 personal property. Actually, it is LITERALLY personal property under 35 U.S. Code § 261 - Ownership; assignment: "Subject to the provisions of this title, patents shall have the attributes of personal property." https://t.co/4QV9mWcCme

@PiersRidyard@Lawrence\u tko好的，如果更好的话，我会引用美国代码-专利r相当于2个人财产。实际上，根据《美国法典》第35章第261条——所有权，它实际上是个人财产；转让：“根据本篇的规定，专利应具有个人财产的属性。”https://t.co/4QV9mWcCme

@TeamSatoshi Have you read and fully understood the patent, which is a P2P device method and system?

@TeamSatoshi您是否阅读并充分理解了该专利，即P2P设备方法和系统？

@TeamSatoshi I've hired 4 IP firms & happen to be rather creative myself. You are guessing, which is your right, but you are definitely misconstruing facts.
The only way to determine if any patented IP is in the bitcoin code, is to review the entire codebase, then the entire patent universe

@TeamSatoshi我已经雇佣了4家知识产权公司；我自己也很有创意。你在猜测，这是你的权利，但你肯定误解了事实。
确定比特币代码中是否存在任何专利IP的唯一方法是查看整个代码库，然后查看整个专利范围

@TeamSatoshi You said "No patented code is in bitcoin"
So, you have read through every line of the current bitcoin codebase, then reviewed every relevant patent granted since 2008?
You are currently spreading misinformation. If you haven't audited bitcoin code, you shouldn't act like U did https://t.co/GK1UWE9yDa

@TeamSatoshi你说过“比特币中没有专利代码”
那么，您已经阅读了当前比特币代码库的每一行，然后审查了自2008年以来授予的所有相关专利？
您当前正在传播错误信息。如果你没有审核过比特币代码，你就不应该表现得像你一样https://t.co/GK1UWE9yDa

@TeamSatoshi You said, "Opensource negates patent based on the release into the public arena if not under previous patent."
So, assuming you're correct, if Bitcoin incorporated technology that was already patented, then it would be in violation of said patent whether opensource or not, right?

@TeamSatoshi You说，“如果不是在以前的专利范围内，开放源代码基于向公共领域的发布否定了专利。”
所以，假设你是对的，如果比特币包含了已经获得专利的技术，那么无论开源与否，它都将违反上述专利，对吗？

@TeamSatoshi Are you an intellectual property lawyer that specializes in crypto? Using uncommon words doesn’t add weight to your argument. Bitcoin can never be "prior art to any and all products', period! Once bitcoin incorporates patented property, it infringes. There is no magic "Free Pass"

@TeamSatoshi你是专门从事加密技术的知识产权律师吗？使用不寻常的词语不会增加你论点的份量。比特币永远不可能是“任何和所有产品的先决技术”，没错！一旦比特币包含了专利财产，它就侵犯了。没有神奇的“免费通行证”

@PiersRidyard @Lawrence_tko That was a refreshingly intellectual debate. Thanks for the discussion. Oh yeah, as for the real property vs intellectual property debate. See attached. https://t.co/EnOEiRJJYi

@PiersRidyard@Lawrence\u tko这是一场令人耳目一新的学术辩论。感谢您的讨论。哦，是的，关于不动产与知识产权的辩论。请参见附件。https://t.co/EnOEiRJJYi