@LegalLimitEnt Because it was a Swiss company, not a US company. They did not seek to market their offering on US soil nor can such be proved.
There is no requirement for them to have filed a Form D.

@LegalLimitEnt 因为它是一家瑞士公司，而不是美国公司。他们没有寻求在美国本土销售他们的产品，也无法证明这一点。
他们不需要提交表格 D。

@LegalLimitEnt The smarter road is *no corporate entity* at all.
That's how I do it, but you're a lawyer so I say "Do not try this at home. I am a professional."

@LegalLimitEnt 更智能的道路是*没有公司实体*。
我就是这样做的，但你是一名律师，所以我说“不要在家里尝试这个。我是专业人士。”

@LegalLimitEnt You wanna raise from the public in 2022?
Offer a token. File a Form D exemption and do a Reg A+ with a capped sale at $75M.
You can't make it in crypto w/ $75M you deserve to fail.

@LegalLimitEnt 你想在 2022 年从公众那里筹集资金吗？
提供代币。提交表格 D 豁免并以 7500 万美元的上限销售进行 Reg A。
你不能用 7500 万美元的加密货币成功，你应该失败。

@LegalLimitEnt Untrue. When you file a Form D you have the SSNs of the principals and the EIN of the corporate structure being offered. That's even for an exemption, not an actual security offering.

@LegalLimitEnt 不真实。当您提交表格 D 时，您会获得负责人的 SSN 和所提供的公司结构的 EIN。这甚至是豁免，而不是实际的安全产品。

@LegalLimitEnt How does one even make a claim of being "FINRA Series 7 compliant"?

@LegalLimitEnt 甚至如何声称“符合FINRA Series 7”？

@LegalLimitEnt Imagine the smart contract code required to render a fully FINRA Series 7 compliant security.
How many lines of code is that and how much does developing it cost?
Who is a clearing house? Who is a broker-dealer? What is an exchange? When is someone a beneficial owner?

@LegalLimitEnt 想象一下呈现完全符合 FINRA Series 7 的安全性所需的智能合约代码。
那是多少行代码，开发它的成本是多少？
谁是票据交换所？谁是经纪人？什么是交换？什么时候有人是受益所有人？

@LegalLimitEnt Name an investment vehicle - other than a cryptocurrency - which does not by law necessitate an entity which is known to the state either by SSN or EIN.
Just one.

@LegalLimitEnt 命名一种投资工具 - 除了加密货币 - 根据法律，它不需要国家通过 SSN 或 EIN 知道的实体。
只有一个。

@LegalLimitEnt Because an equity is the analogous security to an ICO and an equity has no value without a backing entity.
Zombie stocks are really close to crypto: they are basically dead companies whose value is that it is traded. They are the fodder of reverse mergers.

@LegalLimitEnt 因为股权是类似于 ICO 的证券，如果没有支持实体，股权就没有价值。
僵尸股票非常接近加密货币：它们基本上是死去的公司，其价值在于交易。它们是反向并购的源泉。

RT: @BryceWeiner Preev is back online after a DNS outage. Apologies for the extended delay.

RT：@BryceWeiner Preev 在 DNS 中断后重新上线。为延长延迟道歉。

@LegalLimitEnt Look at every other action from https://block.one/ to Ripple to CabbageTech and each instance there was a clear entity to pin it on.

@LegalLimitEnt 看看从 https://block.one/ 到 Ripple 到 CabbageTech 的所有其他操作，每个实例都有一个明确的实体将其固定。

@LegalLimitEnt It certainly does from an enforcement standpoint, which is all that really matters. They got away with it. Does that make it worthy of study? Absolutely. They cheated and won.

@LegalLimitEnt 从执法的角度来看确实如此，这才是真正重要的。他们侥幸逃脱。这是否值得研究？绝对地。他们作弊并赢了。

Untrue.
If you read the SEC report they clearly name https://slock.it/ as the entity responsible.
https://twitter.com/LegalLimit...

不真实。
如果您阅读 SEC 报告，他们会清楚地将 https://slock.it/ 列为责任实体。

@BryceWeiner 在 DAO 被黑客入侵和解散一年后，他们仍然在攻击 DAO。您不需要实体接受美国证券交易委员会的审查。

RT: @BryceWeiner when the sinaloa cartel launders money through hsbc who is the victim

RT：@BryceWeiner 当锡那罗亚卡特尔通过 hsbc 洗钱时，受害者是

TL;DR... there is no cause for the SEC to go after those who sold ETH as an ICO.
Zero.
Yes, they got away with it. 100%.

TL;DR ... SEC 没有理由追捕那些将 ETH 作为 ICO 出售的人。
零。
是的，他们侥幸逃脱了。 100%。

There were no Times Square billboards for the ETH ICO.
Was the ETH ICO advertised to US citizens which were unfamiliar with cryptocurrencies or investing in general?

ETH ICO 没有时代广场的广告牌。
ETH ICO 是否向不熟悉加密货币或一般投资的美国公民宣传？

The SEC has to establish jurisdiction, first.
Usually that means that an entity conducted business which was injurious to US citizens.
Can anyone produce a US citizen which was injured by the ETH ICO?

SEC 必须首先建立管辖权。
通常这意味着一个实体开展的业务对美国公民有害。
任何人都可以生产受 ETH ICO 伤害的美国公民吗？

A) The entity - EthSuisse - wasn't a US company
B) They did not focus on soliciting from US citizens
C) The ICO ended, the tokens were delivered
D) The entity EthSuisse dissolved at the genesis block, so when the SEC woke up there was nobody to sue.
There. Is. Nobody. To. Sue. https://twitter.com/digitalass...

A) 实体 - EthSuisse - 不是美国公司
B) 他们没有专注于向美国公民招揽
C) ICO 结束，代币交付
D) EthSuisse 实体在创世区块解散，因此当 SEC 醒来时，没有人可以起诉。
那里。是。没有人。至。起诉。 https://twitter.com/digitalass...

@mikeinspace @DanDarkPill Why are there so many just bat shit crazy people attracted to crypto?

@mikeinspace @DanDarkPill 为什么会有这么多疯狂的人被加密货币吸引？

Now Playing: The Expendables 3
It's about family.

正在播放：敢死队3
这是关于家庭的。

@slowhandzen pic not unrelated
https://twitter.com/ShadowKnig...

@slowhandzen 图片并非无关

MCU 的复仇者联盟电影就像：https://t.co/rPLnU3eAxj