用户 Brrrrryce Weiner(@ BryceWeiner) 的最新消息

Does the military ...

军方。。。

发表时间:2年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@z3r0n0ns3ns3 Moving goalposts.

@z3r0n0ns3ns3移动门柱。

发表时间:2年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@z3r0n0ns3ns3 I like to consider myself well informed but I am unaware of a disproportionate rate of respiratory ailments in medical professionals as a function of wearing masks all day for 20-30 years.

@Z3R0N0NS3N3我喜欢认为自己很有见识,但我不知道作为20-30年来整天戴着口罩的一种功能,医学专业人员的呼吸系统疾病比例不成比例。

发表时间:2年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@z3r0n0ns3ns3 Doctors don’t have that problem

@Z3R0N0NS3N3医生没有这个问题

发表时间:2年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@MimeticValue I live 500 feet from a navy base. The whole town follows their lead on procedures on this. I trust the military because their sole purpose is to cause death. A crochet mask is fine for a Sunday stroll. Military personnel here wear masks on their necks and raise them when needed

@我住在离海军基地500英尺的地方。全镇的人都在遵循他们的程序。我信任军队,因为他们唯一的目的就是要造成死亡。一个钩针面具可以在星期天散步。这里的军人脖子上戴着口罩,需要时就把口罩举起来

发表时间:2年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@MimeticValue She’s saying she’s so clean she can wear a minimal mask (virtue signal) but is then wearing a mask in the car like it’s an airborne contaminant present in concentrations that a mask must be worn when you leave your oh-so-sterile sanctuary.

@她说她很干净,她可以戴一个最小限度的面具(美德信号),但在车里戴着一个面具,就像空气中的污染物浓度一样,当你离开你的无菌避难所时,必须戴上面具。

发表时间:2年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@MimeticValue Back to the point, I think folks noticed there was something wrong with that picture but missed what it was and then ran with it.
It’s definitely elitist virtue signaling, but not what folks say it is.

@我想大家都注意到这张照片有点问题,但没注意到它是什么,然后就跟着它跑了。
这绝对是精英美德的信号,但不是人们所说的。

发表时间:2年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@MimeticValue The assumption being made by everyone is that trace levels of particles are present. A fair assumption, but still an assumption.

@模拟值每个人的假设是存在微量粒子。一个公平的假设,但仍然是一个假设。

发表时间:2年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@MimeticValue Fewer particles means less measures necessary. That’s the difference between a T10,000 clean room and a T1,000,000 clean room. You’re not making parts for a space ship.

@模拟值较少的粒子意味着需要较少的测量。这就是T10000洁净室和T1000000洁净室的区别。你不是在为太空船制造零件。

发表时间:2年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@MimeticValue @gutreactions1 Read on sir. Debunking bad science is usually more effort than proving good science.

@模拟值@gutreactions1读到长官。揭穿不好的科学通常比证明好的科学更努力。

发表时间:2年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@MimeticValue @gutreactions1 This is a stimulating discussion rarely had civilly and I thank you for it. I think others will get a lot out of it.

@模仿价值@勇气反应1这是一个很刺激的讨论很少有礼貌,我感谢你。我想其他人会从中得到很多。

发表时间:2年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@MimeticValue @gutreactions1 That’s what science looks like.
Waving a hand and saying because X, then Y is a logical fallacy because not all things are equal.

@模仿价值@勇气反应1这就是科学的样子。
挥手说,因为X,那么Y是一个逻辑谬论,因为不是所有的东西都是平等的。

发表时间:2年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@MimeticValue @gutreactions1 How footpounds of force is material ejected that spray can?
How many footpounds of force are exerted when your breathe?
What is the comparable water vapor concentration between breath and that spray can?
Is that difference relevant to the results? How?

@模拟值@guttreactions1喷雾罐中的物质是如何被喷射出来的?
当你呼吸时,有多少个力的脚底?
呼吸和喷雾罐之间的水蒸气浓度是多少?
这种差异与结果有关吗?怎么用?

发表时间:2年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@MimeticValue @gutreactions1 I’m not defending anything but clear thinking.

@我不是在为任何事情辩护,而是在为清晰的思维辩护。

发表时间:2年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@MimeticValue @gutreactions1 Take this stupid “experiment” for instance.
I’ll destroy it in a few tweets.
https://twitter.com/goyalsanje... https://twitter.com/goyalsanje...

Don't know which he spray this guy used, but seems like a pretty good way to test if #mask is good or bad ..
#FightAgainstCoronavirus #COVID2019
https://t.co/s5srUlc0sW

发表时间:2年前 作者:#Intolerant भारतीय (Sanjeev Goyal) @goyalsanjeev

@以这个愚蠢的实验为例。
我会在几条推特上销毁它。
http://www.google.com/sea….tin round+rock+texas网站http://www.google.com/sea….tin round+rock+texas网站

不知道这家伙用的是哪种喷雾,但似乎是个很好的测试口罩好坏的方法。。
#对抗冠状病毒
https://t.co/s5srUlc0sW

发表时间:2年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@MimeticValue @gutreactions1 I also suggested you replicate it for yourself to measure its effectivness at blocking water vapor from your mouth during the normal course of a day.

@模拟值@gutreactions 1我还建议你自己复制它,以测量它在一天的正常过程中阻止水蒸气从你嘴里流出的效果。

发表时间:2年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@MimeticValue @gutreactions1 Not one person mentioned they were wearing the masks in a car which is useless for a bunch of people who live in the same home, anyway.
Y’all too clever by half.

@没有人提到他们在车上戴着面具,这对住在同一个家里的一群人来说毫无用处。
你们都太聪明了。

发表时间:2年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@MimeticValue @gutreactions1 Irrelevant to real world application. Minimal measures are sufficient.

@模拟值@gutreactions1与实际应用无关。最少的措施就足够了。

发表时间:2年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@MimeticValue @gutreactions1 I’m sorry but this isn’t Bill Nye level science demonstrations.

@很抱歉,这不是比尔·奈级别的科学演示。

发表时间:2年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@MimeticValue @gutreactions1 Are you not going to take normal procedures to avoid spreading germs when you sneeze just because you’re wearing a mask?
That’s why it’s pseudoscience. It’s not even an approximate of real world conditions.

@当你仅仅因为戴着口罩而打喷嚏时,你不会采取正常的程序来避免细菌传播吗?
这就是为什么这是伪科学。它甚至不是真实世界条件的近似值。

发表时间:2年前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情